Construct · 1 fields · 1 citations

explanation soundness and completeness: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
explanation soundnessand completeness1 CONSTRUCTExplanation soundnessKULESZA · HUMAN-COMPUTER

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Human-computer interaction

two properties of explanations from intelligent systems, truthfulness of each element and coverage of the whole system, that shape the quality of users' mental models.

In human-computer interaction, explanation soundness and completeness refers to two properties of explanations from intelligent systems, truthfulness of each element and coverage of the whole system, that shape the quality of users' mental models. This meaning comes from Kulesza (2013) in 2013 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing.[1]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how explanation soundness and completeness sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

completeness3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructscoverage3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructselement3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Kulesza, T., Stumpf, S., Burnett, M., Yang, S., Kwan, I., & Wong, W. (2013). Too much, too little, or just right? Ways explanations impact end users' mental models. 2013 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/vlhcc.2013.6645235

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct