Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does maven collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningopinion leadershipcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to maven is opinion leadership.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

maven2 CONSTRUCTSMarket mavenFEICK & PRICE · MARKETInfluential hubWATTS & DODDS · HUB

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Marketing and consumer behavior

A broadly informed consumer

A consumer who accumulates broad knowledge about many products, prices, shops, and deals, and who enjoys passing that information on to others, without being an expert in any single category. Feick and Price named and measured this person in 1987 in The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information, scoring the trait with a short self-report scale and separating it from both the opinion leader, whose influence is tied to one product area, and the early adopter, who is defined by buying first. The market maven's mark is breadth of general marketplace awareness, not depth in any one topic. This referent is a measured personality trait of a shopper, and it has nothing to do with a stickler for correct grammar or with a well-placed node in a diffusion network.[1]

Unit
One consumer, scored on a self-report trait scale
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Feick and Price's six-item market maven scale, reported by the person about themselves

Network sociology of diffusion

An influential network hub

A highly connected individual thought to sit at the center of an information network and to set off the wide spread of a product, idea, or behavior once they adopt it, the figure popular writing calls a maven or connector. Watts and Dodds examined this hub hypothesis directly in 2007 in Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation, and their simulations found that large cascades are usually driven not by these special hubs but by a critical mass of ordinary, easily influenced people. Here the maven is a position in a graph and a claim about who starts cascades, not a self-reported trait or a grammar critic. This referent is a structural role in a diffusion network, tested and largely doubted, and it should not be read as the marketing trait it is often confused with.[2]

Unit
One node in a diffusion network, by its connections and reach
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Modeled by degree and by influence over cascades in network simulations

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how maven sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

opinion leadership6 names · 10 citationsjangle · six names, one contested constructdiffusion6 fields · 12 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsword of mouth4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one label, three objects

References

  1. Feick, L. F., & Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251146
  2. Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/518527

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct