Construct · 1 fields · 3 citations

misdirection: a standalone construct

One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.

● anchor · attention control in conjuring Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
misdirection1 CONSTRUCTMisdirectionKUHN · ATTENTION

A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

Cognitive science of magic

Steering attention away from the secret

Misdirection is the conjuror's control of where a spectator looks, attends, and reasons, so that the method of a trick unfolds outside awareness even when it happens in plain sight. The modern cognitive literature treats it as a family of techniques that exploit covert attention, change blindness, and expectation rather than merely moving the eyes, and Kuhn, Caffaratti, Teszka, and Rensink's A psychologically-based taxonomy of misdirection sorts these into perceptual, memory, and reasoning forms. Macknik and colleagues' Attention and awareness in stage magic and Kuhn, Amlani, and Rensink's Towards a science of magic argue that studying misdirection gives attention research a ready-made toolkit for dissociating what we look at from what we see. The referent is the directed allocation of a perceiver's attention, measured by eye-tracking and detection failures.[1][2][3]

Unit
The share of spectators who miss a method performed in view
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Studied with eye-tracking, change- and inattentional-blindness tasks, and post-trick detection and recall probes

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how misdirection sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entry

Nearby constructs

vanish2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Kuhn, G., Caffaratti, H. A., Teszka, R., & Rensink, R. A. (2014). A psychologically-based taxonomy of misdirection. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01392
  2. Macknik, S. L., King, M., Randi, J., Robbins, A., Teller, Thompson, J., & Martinez-Conde, S. (2008). Attention and awareness in stage magic: Turning tricks into research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(11), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2473
  3. Kuhn, G., Amlani, A. A., & Rensink, R. A. (2008). Towards a science of magic. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(9), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.008

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct