Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does positioning collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningstrategycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to positioning is strategy.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

positioning4 CONSTRUCTSBrand positioningRIES & TROUT · MIND SHAREGNSS positioningZUMBERGE · GNSS FIXPositioning theoryDAVIES & HARRÉ · SLOTStrategic positionPORTER · ACTIVITY FIT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Marketing and strategy

A distinctive place in the customer's mind

The deliberate design of a brand's offer and communication so that it occupies a distinctive, valued place in the mind of a target customer, defined relative to competing brands rather than in absolute terms. Ries and Trout argued in Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind that customers hold a mental ladder of brands in each category, and that a brand wins by claiming an unoccupied rung and repeating a simple, differentiating message. The referent is a perception to be shaped through segmentation, a positioning statement, and a perceptual map, not a coordinate to be estimated, a subject slot in talk, or a firm's configuration of activities.[1]

Unit
A brand's claimed place in the customer's mind, relative to rivals
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed through perceptual maps, brand association surveys, and tracking of awareness and preference against competitors

Satellite navigation and geodesy

A receiver's location fixed from satellite signals

The determination of a receiver's location, and often its clock offset, by estimating it from the measured ranges to several satellites of known position, as in GPS and other global navigation satellite systems. Zumberge and colleagues set out precise point positioning, in which precomputed satellite orbits and clocks let a single receiver's coordinates be solved to centimetre level, with accuracy limited by measurement geometry through the dilution of precision. The referent is a quantitative estimation problem solved by trilateration and least squares, expressed in metres of coordinates, not a place in a customer's mind, a slot in a conversation, or a firm's strategy.[2]

Unit
An estimated receiver coordinate, in metres, with an error bound
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed by trilateration and least squares from satellite pseudoranges and carrier phase, with quality reported as dilution of precision and coordinate uncertainty

Discursive psychology

the process by which people are located, and locate each other, as particular kinds of subject within conversation.

In positioning theory, the process by which people are located, and locate themselves and each other, as particular kinds of subject within the unfolding story lines of a conversation, taking up and assigning rights, duties, and ways of speaking. Davies and Harré argued that to be positioned in a discursive act is to be made available a certain repertoire of things one may say and do, so that the self is produced and reproduced in talk rather than fixed in advance. The referent is a fluid social location within discourse, traced by close reading of interaction, not a coordinate, a brand image, or a competitive stance.[3]

Unit
A subject location taken up or assigned within a story line
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Traced by discourse and conversation analysis of who is positioned how, with what rights and duties, across the turns of an interaction

Competitive strategy

A firm's distinctive activity configuration

A firm's strategic position: the distinctive configuration of activities by which it seeks sustainable competitive advantage, performing different activities from rivals or performing similar activities in different ways. Porter argued in What is strategy? that strategy rests on choosing a position competitors cannot easily straddle, defended by trade-offs and by the fit among a company's activities, and that this is separate from operational effectiveness, which every firm pursues on the same frontier. The referent is a firm's place in the space of activity choices within an industry, not a place in a buyer's mind, a location in talk, or a solved coordinate.[4]

Unit
A firm's chosen activity configuration within an industry
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Characterised by activity system maps, value chain analysis, and the trade-offs and fit that set a firm's chosen position apart from rivals'

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how positioning sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

competitive advantage4 names · 5 citationsjangle · one edge, rival explanationstrilateration3 fields · 3 citationsinvariant · one construct, three systemsabsolute2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Ries, A., & Trout, J. (2001). Positioning: The battle for your mind (20th anniversary ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  2. Zumberge, J. F., Heflin, M. B., Jefferson, D. C., Watkins, M. M., & Webb, F. H. (1997). Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 102(B3), 5005–5017. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03860
  3. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
  4. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct