Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does quorum collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningquorum sensingcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to quorum is quorum sensing.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

quorum2 CONSTRUCTSQuorum sensingBASSLER · CELL DENSITYReplication quorumGIFFORD · NODES TO COMMIT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Microbiology

bacteria tracking their population density via signalling molecules and switching on group behaviours past a threshold.

The process by which bacteria track their own population density and switch on group behaviours only once enough cells are present: each cell steadily releases a small signalling molecule called an autoinducer, and when the surrounding concentration climbs past a threshold, meaning a large enough gathering of cells has built up, the population turns on shared genes together, controlling traits such as light production, biofilm formation, and the release of toxins. Miller and Bassler's 2001 review Quorum sensing in bacteria set out how these chemical circuits let a colony act as a single coordinated group. Here the referent is a density-dependent chemical signalling process among living cells, not a count of people needed to hold a vote or a number of computers needed to commit a change.[1]

Unit
One density threshold in a bacterial population, marked by autoinducer concentration
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Detected by tracking autoinducer concentration and the density-dependent switching of reporter genes such as bioluminescence

Distributed systems

Minimum nodes to commit an operation

The minimum number of copies in a replicated computer system that must take part for an operation to be accepted, chosen so that any two operations are forced to overlap on at least one copy and so cannot silently disagree: by requiring, for example, a majority of copies to acknowledge every read and every write, the system stays consistent even when some machines fail or messages are lost. Gifford's 1979 paper Weighted voting for replicated data introduced this quorum approach, giving votes to copies and requiring read and write quorums whose sizes are set to overlap; majority quorums in the same spirit underpin later consensus protocols such as Paxos. Here the referent is a threshold of agreeing machines needed to commit safely, not a rule about people present at a meeting or a density of signalling bacteria.[2]

Unit
The minimum number of replica copies whose agreement commits an operation, often a majority
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Defined by the read and write quorum sizes, set so that every write quorum overlaps every read and write quorum

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how quorum sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

consensus4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructssignal5 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, five constructsnetwork4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Miller, M. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2001). Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology, 55, 165–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165
  2. Gifford, D. K. (1979). Weighted voting for replicated data. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (pp. 150–162). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/800215.806583

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct