Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four disciplinary constructs Nearest construct by meaningspiritualitycompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to religiosity is spirituality.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A person's motivational stance toward their own faith, sorted by whether religion is an end in itself or a means to other goals. Allport and Ross's 1967 Personal religious orientation and prejudice drew the contrast between intrinsic religiosity, where faith is lived as the guiding aim of life, and extrinsic religiosity, where religion is used for comfort, status, or belonging. Here religiosity names an individual's inner motive for believing, scored on attitude scales, not a set of societal dimensions, a workplace value driver, or a cost-bearing economic choice.[1]
A profile across separable dimensions of a group's or a person's religious life rather than a single quantity. Glock and Stark's 1965 Religion and society in tension argued that religiosity has distinct parts: belief, ritual practice, religious experience, religious knowledge, and the consequences faith has for daily conduct, and a person can rank high on one and low on another. Here religiosity is a many-dimensioned map of religious involvement, not an inner motive orientation, a driver of work attitudes, or a costly economic commitment.[2]
An employee characteristic treated as a cause of workplace attitudes and ethical judgments. Parboteeah, Hoegl, and Cullen's 2008 Ethics and religion: An empirical test of a multidimensional model modeled religiosity as cognitive, affective, and behavioral components and tested how each shapes whether individuals are willing to justify ethically suspect behavior at work. Here religiosity is an input to organizational outcomes, measured to predict work values and ethical stances, not a personal faith orientation, a sociological dimension profile, or an economic cost.[3]
The level of costly participation a person rationally chooses within a religious group, viewed through the economics of collective goods. Iannaccone's 1992 Sacrifice and stigma modeled religion as a club good and treated religiosity as commitment made visible through sacrifice: demanding rules and stigma screen out low-commitment free-riders and raise the value of the group for those who stay. Here religiosity is a cost-bearing behavior set by group incentives, read from what people do and give up, not an inner motive orientation, a survey dimension profile, or a workplace value driver.[4]
Next
See how religiosity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct