Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexedSpokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In phylogenetics, rooting is the act of placing the root on an otherwise unrooted tree, which fixes the direction of evolutionary time and so tells you which character states are ancestral and which are derived. The usual method is outgroup comparison: a taxon known to lie outside the group of interest is added, and the point where it attaches marks the root. Maddison, Donoghue, and Maddison's 1984 Outgroup analysis and parsimony set out how outgroup structure determines character polarity and thereby the root. The referent is a choice of origin imposed on a branching diagram, and it has nothing to do with growing roots on a plant cutting or unlocking a phone.[1]
In mobile computing, rooting is the process of obtaining root (superuser) privileges on a device, typically an Android phone, so the owner or an attacker can bypass the restrictions the manufacturer builds into the operating system. It is achieved by exploiting a vulnerability or an unlocked bootloader to gain the highest level of system access. Sun, Cuadros, and Beznosov's 2015 Android rooting surveys the methods, their detection, and how they evade it. The referent is the capture of top-level control over a computing system, sharing only the word with a plant cutting's new roots or a tree's origin point.[2]
Next
See how rooting sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct