Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations

Where does self-determination collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · autonomy of a person, or a people Nearest construct by meaninghedonic motivationcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to self-determination is hedonic motivation.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

self-determination3 CONSTRUCTSSDT motivationRYAN & DECI · AUTONOMYRight of peoplesEMERSON · RIGHT OF PEOPLESCausal agencyWEHMEYER · CAUSAL AGENT

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Psychology

the degree to which behaviour is autonomously motivated by intrinsic interest or internalised values rather than controlled by external pressures.

The degree to which a person's behaviour is autonomously motivated, arising from the self and from intrinsic interest or well-internalised values, rather than controlled by external rewards, pressures, or contingencies: in self-determination theory it is a quality of motivation fostered by satisfying the basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Ryan and Deci's 2000 Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being set out how autonomous motivation is supported or undermined, building on Deci and Ryan's 1985 Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. The referent is a property of an individual's motivation, measured on self-report scales, not a collective right held by a whole people or a set of life skills taught to a person with a disability.[1][2]

Unit
A person's degree of autonomous versus controlled motivation
Recovery means
Restored autonomous motivation and well-being when the needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness are supported again
Measured by
Self-report scales of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, relative autonomy indices, and ratings of perceived autonomy support

International law and political science

the collective right of a people to freely determine its political status and pursue its economic, social and cultural development.

The right of a people to freely determine its political status and freely pursue its economic, social, and cultural development, held collectively rather than by any single person: rooted in Wilsonian principles and codified in the United Nations Charter and the common Article 1 of the two 1966 human rights covenants, it grounds contested claims to independence, autonomy, or self-government. Emerson's 1971 Self-Determination traced how the principle passed from a political ideal into a disputed norm of international law. The referent is a collective legal and political entitlement of a people, argued over in treaties and tribunals, not a quality of one person's motivation or a set of individual life skills.[3]

Unit
A people's right to freely determine its political status
Recovery means
Not applicable; a collective legal right, not a state to regain
Measured by
Not measured; adjudicated by treaty text, state practice, plebiscites, and the opinions of courts and tribunals

Disability studies and special education

acting as the primary causal agent in one's own life, making quality-of-life choices free from undue external influence.

A dispositional characteristic in which a person acts as the primary causal agent in his or her own life and makes choices and decisions about his or her quality of life free from undue external influence: in disability studies and special education it is built from volitional action, self-regulation, psychological empowerment, and self-realisation, and expressed through choice-making, goal-setting, problem-solving, and self-advocacy. Wehmeyer's 1999 A functional model of self-determination defined it as a characteristic of the person that develops across the lifespan and can be taught through instruction. The referent is an individual's causal agency and the skills that support it, assessed by behavioural instruments and cultivated by teaching, not a quality of motivation or a right vested in a whole people.[4]

Unit
An individual acting as the causal agent in his or her own life
Recovery means
Developed through instruction in choice-making, goal-setting, and self-advocacy skills
Measured by
Instruments such as the Arc's Self-Determination Scale, indexing autonomy, self-regulation, psychological empowerment, and self-realisation

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how self-determination sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

motivation6 fields · 18 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsautonomy6 fields · 14 citationsjingle · one name, six constructshedonic motivation6 names · 10 citationsjangle · six names, one construct

References

  1. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  2. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  3. Emerson, R. (1971). Self-determination. American Journal of International Law, 65(3), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2198970
  4. Wehmeyer, M. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769901400107

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct