Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does shuffle collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
shuffle2 CONSTRUCTSExon shufflingGILBERT · 1978Riffle shuffleBAYER & DIACONIS · 1992

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Molecular evolution

recombination of exons so that modules encoding protein domains are duplicated or joined into new proteins.

In molecular evolution, exon shuffling is the recombination of exons (the coding segments of genes) so that modules encoding protein domains are duplicated or joined in new combinations to build novel proteins. Gilbert's 1978 Why genes in pieces? proposed that the split structure of eukaryotic genes, with exons separated by introns, allows this reassortment and speeds the evolution of new functions. The referent is a genomic recombination process, inferred from shared domains and intron positions across proteins, and it is a different construct from randomizing a deck of cards or the data-regrouping stage of a computation.[1]

Unit
The rate at which exons recombine into new domain combinations
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Inferred from shared protein domains, intron phase conservation, and module boundaries across genes

Probability

a model of mixing a deck by cutting and interleaving it, asking how many riffles make the order random.

In probability, the riffle (or dovetail) shuffle is a mathematical model of mixing: a deck is cut into two packets that are interleaved, and the question is how many such shuffles are needed before the order is effectively random. Bayer and Diaconis's 1992 Trailing the dovetail shuffle to its lair solved the model and produced the famous result that about seven riffles suffice to mix a 52-card deck, with randomness setting in sharply around that point. The referent is a Markov mixing process on permutations, measured by how fast its distance from the uniform distribution falls, and it is unrelated to gene recombination or a computational shuffle stage.[2]

Unit
The number of shuffles until the deck's order is effectively uniform
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Quantified by the total-variation distance from the uniform distribution as a function of shuffle count

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how shuffle sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

intron1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a single constructsplicing1 fields · 2 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Gilbert, W. (1978). Why genes in pieces? Nature, 271(5645), 501. https://doi.org/10.1038/271501a0
  2. Bayer, D., & Diaconis, P. (1992). Trailing the dovetail shuffle to its lair. The Annals of Applied Probability, 2(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoap/1177005705

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct