Construct · 3 fields · 5 citations

Where does mixing collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningspreadcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to mixing is spread.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

mixing3 CONSTRUCTSEntropy of mixingGIBBS · ENTROPY OF MIXINGMixing (ergodic)GIBBS · INK-DROP IMAGESocial mixingNOLD · CONTACT PATTERN

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Thermodynamics and chemistry

The entropy released when substances intermingle

The entropy of mixing is the rise in entropy that occurs when two or more distinct substances, at first kept apart, are allowed to intermingle, a change that is irreversible for substances that can be told apart. Gibbs's 1876 On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances derived this quantity from the composition of a mixture and showed that combining two different gases raises entropy by an amount that does not depend on how alike the gases are, while combining a gas with more of itself raises it by nothing, the puzzle now called the Gibbs paradox. The referent here is a thermodynamic state function scaled in energy per unit temperature, and it has nothing to do with the loss of memory in a stirred dynamical system or the pattern of contacts between social groups.[1]

Unit
A change in entropy on combining substances, in joules per kelvin (or per mole)
Recovery means
Not applicable: for substances that can be told apart the process is thermodynamically irreversible
Measured by
Computed from the mole fractions of the components, for ideal mixing as minus R times the sum of each fraction times its logarithm

Ergodic theory and dynamical systems

A strong form of randomization that erases initial conditions

In the study of dynamical systems, mixing is a strong form of randomization in which a system loses track of its starting configuration as time passes, so that any region of the state space becomes, over the long run, spread evenly through every other region. Gibbs's 1902 Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics gave the intuitive picture with its image of a drop of dark ink stirred into water until the fluid looks uniformly grey, and the property was later given a precise measure-theoretic definition, set out for example in Walters's 1982 An Introduction to Ergodic Theory, as the statistical independence of a set from its own image after long times. The referent is a mathematical property of a transformation on a probability space, and it is distinct from the entropy released when substances intermingle or the contact patterns that carry a disease.[2][3]

Unit
A property a measure-preserving transformation either has or lacks, defined as a limit over long times
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Established by proof, or estimated numerically through the decay of correlations between a function and its time-shifted values

Epidemiology and social contact

The pattern of who contacts whom across a population

Social mixing is the pattern of who comes into contact with whom across a population, the structure of interaction between age groups or other categories that governs how far and how fast a transmissible infection spreads. Nold's 1980 Heterogeneity in disease-transmission modeling introduced proportionate mixing to represent these unequal contact rates inside transmission models, and Mossong and colleagues' 2008 Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases measured them directly by surveying tens of thousands of daily contacts across eight countries. The referent is an empirical pattern of human contact, counted as contacts per person per day between groups, and it is unrelated to the entropy of combining substances or the randomization of a dynamical system.[4][5]

Unit
A rate of contacts per person per day between groups, often arranged as a contact matrix
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated from contact diaries and population surveys, then encoded as a mixing matrix used in transmission models

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how mixing sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

entropy6 fields · 12 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsmixture2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsadmixture1 fields · 2 citationsanchor · a standalone construct

References

  1. Gibbs, J. W. (1876). On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 3, 108–248.
  2. Gibbs, J. W. (1902). Elementary principles in statistical mechanics. Yale University Press.
  3. Walters, P. (1982). An introduction to ergodic theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5775-2
  4. Nold, A. (1980). Heterogeneity in disease-transmission modeling. Mathematical Biosciences, 52(3–4), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(80)90069-3
  5. Mossong, J., Hens, N., Jit, M., Beutels, P., Auranen, K., Mikolajczyk, R., et al. (2008). Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases. PLoS Medicine, 5(3), e74. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct