Construct · 5 fields · 6 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four prohibitions Nearest construct by meaningpuritycompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to taboo is purity.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A prohibition that sets certain persons, objects, or acts apart as either sacred or dangerous, so that contact with them is forbidden and a breach is felt to pollute. The word comes from the Polynesian tapu, which European observers borrowed to name the local system of ritual avoidance. Mary Douglas's Purity and Danger (1966) argued that ideas of pollution and defilement are not primitive hygiene but a way of ordering the world, treating dirt as matter out of place and a taboo as a boundary that keeps a category clean. The referent here is a shared social rule tied to the sacred and the unclean, upheld by a community and often repaired by ritual, not a private wish, a priced decision, or an avoided word.[1]
A prohibition whose force comes not from an outside authority but from a desire that has been repressed, so that the forbidden act is at once dreaded and secretly wished for. Sigmund Freud's Totem and Taboo (1913) read taboo as this deep ambivalence, and treated the incest taboo as its clearest case, holding that the rule is strongest exactly where the temptation is strongest. On this account a taboo marks a wish that cannot be admitted, and the guilt and horror around it are signs of the buried desire, not of any real danger in the thing itself. The referent is a psychic conflict inside the person, inferred from ambivalence and compulsion, and it differs from a public rule about the sacred, a refusal to name a price, or a word left unsaid.[2]
A value held so sacred that people refuse to weigh it against money, and react with outrage when asked to. Alan Fiske and Philip Tetlock's Taboo trade-offs (1997) and Tetlock's later work described these protected or sacred values, such as a friendship, a child, or a citizen's vote, which people treat as beyond price and feel insulted to be offered cash for. The taboo here is not a ritual rule or a hidden wish but a measurable pattern in choice, seen in the outrage, the slow response, and the moral cleansing people seek after merely contemplating the trade. The referent is a decision people will not make and the reaction that follows, studied in the lab against an explicit money offer, and it is a different object from a pollution rule, a repressed desire, or a forbidden word.[3][4]
A word that a community treats as too charged, offensive, or dangerous to say plainly, so that speakers avoid it or reach for a milder substitute. Keith Allan and Kate Burridge's Forbidden Words (2006) surveyed how taboo shapes language, driving the euphemisms, evasions, and outright bans that grow up around death, bodily functions, sex, and the sacred. The taboo here lives in usage, being the reason one word is whispered or replaced while its plain synonym is not, and it shifts as what a community finds offensive shifts. The referent is a fact about speech, a word marked off within a language, and not a ritual prohibition, an inner conflict, or a refused market exchange.[5]
In religious studies, taboo refers to rules of pollution and avoidance read as a way of ordering categories, so that dirt is matter out of place. This meaning comes from Douglas (1966) in Purity and danger.[6]
Next
See how taboo sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct