Construct · 5 fields · 6 citations

Where does taboo collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four prohibitions Nearest construct by meaningpuritycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to taboo is purity.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

taboo5 CONSTRUCTSSacred tabooDOUGLAS · POLLUTION TABOOFreudian tabooFREUD · REPRESSED DESIRETaboo tradeoffTETLOCK · TABOO TRADEOFFTaboo wordALLAN · FORBIDDEN WORDSTabooDOUGLAS · RELIGIOUS STUDIES

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Anthropology

a prohibition setting certain persons, objects or acts apart as sacred or dangerous, so contact is forbidden.

A prohibition that sets certain persons, objects, or acts apart as either sacred or dangerous, so that contact with them is forbidden and a breach is felt to pollute. The word comes from the Polynesian tapu, which European observers borrowed to name the local system of ritual avoidance. Mary Douglas's Purity and Danger (1966) argued that ideas of pollution and defilement are not primitive hygiene but a way of ordering the world, treating dirt as matter out of place and a taboo as a boundary that keeps a category clean. The referent here is a shared social rule tied to the sacred and the unclean, upheld by a community and often repaired by ritual, not a private wish, a priced decision, or an avoided word.[1]

Unit
A community rule forbidding contact with the sacred or polluting
Recovery means
A breach is addressed by purification or ritual cleansing that restores the crossed boundary
Measured by
Recorded by ethnographers through fieldwork on prohibitions, avoidance, and the rites that follow a breach

Psychoanalysis

a prohibition whose force comes from a repressed desire, so the forbidden act is both dreaded and secretly wished for.

A prohibition whose force comes not from an outside authority but from a desire that has been repressed, so that the forbidden act is at once dreaded and secretly wished for. Sigmund Freud's Totem and Taboo (1913) read taboo as this deep ambivalence, and treated the incest taboo as its clearest case, holding that the rule is strongest exactly where the temptation is strongest. On this account a taboo marks a wish that cannot be admitted, and the guilt and horror around it are signs of the buried desire, not of any real danger in the thing itself. The referent is a psychic conflict inside the person, inferred from ambivalence and compulsion, and it differs from a public rule about the sacred, a refusal to name a price, or a word left unsaid.[2]

Unit
An inner, ambivalent prohibition that both forbids and tempts
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Inferred clinically from the ambivalence, guilt, and compulsion that Freud read as signs of a repressed wish

Behavioral economics and decision

A value people refuse to trade off for money

A value held so sacred that people refuse to weigh it against money, and react with outrage when asked to. Alan Fiske and Philip Tetlock's Taboo trade-offs (1997) and Tetlock's later work described these protected or sacred values, such as a friendship, a child, or a citizen's vote, which people treat as beyond price and feel insulted to be offered cash for. The taboo here is not a ritual rule or a hidden wish but a measurable pattern in choice, seen in the outrage, the slow response, and the moral cleansing people seek after merely contemplating the trade. The referent is a decision people will not make and the reaction that follows, studied in the lab against an explicit money offer, and it is a different object from a pollution rule, a repressed desire, or a forbidden word.[3][4]

Unit
A refusal to price a sacred value, measured against a money offer
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Measured in experiments by the moral outrage, response delay, and refusal people show when asked to price a protected value

Linguistics

A word too charged to say plainly

A word that a community treats as too charged, offensive, or dangerous to say plainly, so that speakers avoid it or reach for a milder substitute. Keith Allan and Kate Burridge's Forbidden Words (2006) surveyed how taboo shapes language, driving the euphemisms, evasions, and outright bans that grow up around death, bodily functions, sex, and the sacred. The taboo here lives in usage, being the reason one word is whispered or replaced while its plain synonym is not, and it shifts as what a community finds offensive shifts. The referent is a fact about speech, a word marked off within a language, and not a ritual prohibition, an inner conflict, or a refused market exchange.[5]

Unit
A word avoided in speech or replaced by a euphemism
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Traced by linguists through euphemism, avoidance, and the words speakers replace or refuse within a given community

Religious studies

rules of pollution and avoidance read as a way of ordering categories, so that dirt is matter out of place.

In religious studies, taboo refers to rules of pollution and avoidance read as a way of ordering categories, so that dirt is matter out of place. This meaning comes from Douglas (1966) in Purity and danger.[6]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how taboo sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

ritual5 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four fieldsnorm4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructssanction3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge. (Original work published 1966). ISBN 978-1-134-43819-8. ISBN 9781134438198
  2. Freud, S. (1998). Totem and taboo (A. A. Brill, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original work published 1913). ISBN 978-0-486-40434-9. ISBN 9780486404349
  3. Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18(2), 255–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00058
  4. Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00135-9
  5. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-52564-0. ISBN 9780521525640
  6. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. Routledge and Kegan Paul. ISBN 9780140211504

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct