Construct · 2 fields · 3 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexedSpokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In musical acoustics, the wolf tone is an unstable, stuttering note on a bowed string instrument (most notoriously the cello) that occurs when a played pitch nearly coincides with a strong resonance of the instrument's body, so the string and body exchange energy and beat against each other instead of sounding a steady tone. C. V. Raman's 1916 On the "wolf-note" in bowed stringed instruments gave the first mechanical account of the effect, and Neville Fletcher and Thomas Rossing's The physics of musical instruments frames it in terms of body resonance. The referent is an acoustic instability from a near-coincidence of string and body resonances, and it shares the word with a tuning interval and with the animal but nothing else.[1][2]
In the theory of tuning and temperament, the wolf is an interval left so far from its pure form that it sounds harsh and howling, classically the one much-widened or narrowed fifth that absorbs the leftover comma in a meantone or Pythagorean tuning, so that most keys sound sweet but the keys using that interval are unusable. J. Murray Barbour's Tuning and temperament: A historical survey catalogues how different temperaments place and manage this wolf. The referent is a specific mistuned interval produced by a tuning scheme, not an acoustic instability of an instrument's body and certainly not an animal, joined to them only by the howling sound that gives all three the name.[3]
Next
See how wolf sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct