Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does aberration collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningdistortioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to aberration is distortion.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

aberration4 CONSTRUCTSAberration of lightBRADLEY · STARLIGHT SHIFTOptical aberrationSEIDEL · IMAGE DEFECTAberration scaleCHAPMAN · SCHIZOTYPY SCALEMinimum aberrationFRIES & HUNTER · DESIGN

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Astronomy

Apparent shift in a star's position from the observer's motion

The small apparent change in a star's position caused by the combination of the observer's motion through space and the finite speed of light: as Earth travels along its orbit, starlight appears to arrive from a slightly shifted direction, tracing a tiny yearly ellipse on the sky. James Bradley's 1728 report to the Royal Society, An account of a new discovered motion of the fix'd stars, first identified and named this effect while he was searching for stellar parallax. The referent is an apparent angular displacement set by relative velocity, not a flaw in a lens, a psychological rating, or a property of an experimental design.[1]

Unit
One angle of apparent displacement, in arcseconds
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Determined from precise positional astronomy across the year, giving a maximum yearly shift near 20.5 arcseconds

Optics

A lens or mirror defect that blurs or distorts the image

A departure of a real optical system from perfect imaging, so that rays leaving one point of an object fail to meet again at a single sharp point and the image is blurred or misshapen. Ludwig Seidel's 1856 paper Zur Dioptrik, in Astronomische Nachrichten, derived the third-order theory that separates these defects into five distinct types, now called the Seidel aberrations. The referent is an imaging error built into a lens or mirror, unrelated to the apparent motion of starlight, a schizotypy measure, or a criterion for choosing a fractional design.[2]

Unit
One departure of the wavefront from the ideal, scaled by aberration coefficients
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Quantified by wavefront error or ray-traced spot size, and decomposed into Seidel or Zernike coefficients

Psychology

A reported perceptual distortion used to index proneness to psychosis

In psychopathology research, a self-reported distortion in how a person perceives their own body or immediate surroundings, treated as a marker of proneness to psychosis. Loren Chapman, Jean Chapman, and Michael Raulin's 1978 study Body-image aberration in schizophrenia introduced questionnaire scales that measure these reported distortions, later used widely to identify schizotypy in nonclinical samples. The referent is a measured psychological trait recorded on a rating scale, not an apparent stellar motion, a lens defect, or a design criterion.[3]

Unit
One respondent's score on a true/false perceptual aberration scale
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by summing endorsed items on the Perceptual Aberration Scale, a self-report questionnaire

Statistics

A criterion for ranking fractional factorial designs by their confounding pattern

In the design of experiments, a rule for choosing among fractional factorial designs by minimizing how much low-order effects are confounded, or aliased, with one another. Arthur Fries and William Hunter's 1980 paper on minimum aberration designs, in Technometrics, defined the criterion, which ranks designs by the pattern of shortest confounded effect strings and prefers the one with the fewest at the lowest order. The referent is a numeric property of an experimental plan, not the apparent motion of a star, an imaging defect, or a psychological rating.[4]

Unit
One design's aberration, from its word-length pattern of confounded effects
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed from the design's defining relation as the word-length pattern, then minimized to rank candidate designs

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how aberration sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

distortion4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsparallax3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsaliasing4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Bradley, J. (1728). An account of a new discovered motion of the fix'd stars. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 35(406), 637–661. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1727.0064
  2. Seidel, L. (1856). Zur Dioptrik: Ueber die Entwicklung der Glieder 3ter Ordnung. Astronomische Nachrichten, 43, 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.18560431902
  3. Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1978). Body-image aberration in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(4), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.4.399
  4. Fries, A., & Hunter, W. G. (1980). Minimum aberration 2k–p designs. Technometrics, 22(4), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1980.10486210

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct