Construct · 3 fields · 6 citations

Where does coexistence collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningphasecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to coexistence is phase.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

coexistence3 CONSTRUCTSCoexistence (time)LEIBNIZ · SIMULTANEITYPhase coexistenceGIBBS · PHASE BALANCESpecies coexistenceVOLTERRA · TWO SPECIES

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Philosophy

Substances existing at the same time

In metaphysics, coexistence is the relation between two or more things that exist at the same time. Leibniz, in his 1715 to 1716 correspondence with Samuel Clarke, defined space itself as the order of things that coexist, so that simultaneous existence becomes the basic relation from which spatial order is built. Kant, in his 1781 Critique of Pure Reason, treated coexistence in the Third Analogy of Experience as requiring that coexisting substances stand in thoroughgoing reciprocal interaction, so that they can be known to exist together. The referent is a temporal and metaphysical relation of existing together in time, not phases sharing a container, populations sharing a habitat, or states sharing an uneasy peace.[1][2]

Unit
A relation of simultaneous existence between two or more substances
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Analysed by philosophical argument about time, space, and substance, not by empirical measurement

Thermodynamics

Distinct phases in equilibrium together

In thermodynamics, phase coexistence is the state in which two or more distinct phases of a substance, such as liquid water and its vapour, are present together in stable equilibrium. Gibbs, in On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances (1876 to 1878), gave this its exact treatment: he derived the conditions under which phases coexist and the phase rule relating the number of coexisting phases to the number of components and the free variables of the system. The referent is a physical equilibrium between forms of matter at a shared temperature and pressure, counted by how many phases are present at once, and it has nothing to do with things being simultaneous in time, species living together, or nations at peace.[3]

Unit
The number of phases present together at one temperature and pressure
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Read from phase diagrams and located along coexistence curves, at triple points, and at phase boundaries where phases share equilibrium

Ecology

Species persisting together in one place

In ecology, species coexistence is the lasting persistence of two or more species together in the same place, rather than one competitor driving the others to local extinction. Volterra, in his 1926 Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species Considered Mathematically, modelled when competing populations settle into shared persistence, and Gause's 1934 The Struggle for Existence tested this and held that species with identical requirements cannot persist together. Chesson's 2000 review Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity set out the modern account of what keeps coexistence stable. The referent is a population outcome tracked across a community over time, and it is separate from phases at equilibrium, things being simultaneous in time, or a political truce.[4][5][6]

Unit
Two or more species persisting together in one community over time
Recovery means
A rare species that can grow back from low density is taken to coexist stably
Measured by
Assessed by long-term species persistence, growth rates when invading from low density, and abundance data

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how coexistence sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

population ecology3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one phrase, two disciplinesequilibrium4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsniche6 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, six constructs

References

  1. Leibniz, G. W., & Clarke, S. (1715–1716). The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence.
  2. Kant, I. (1781). Critique of pure reason.
  3. Gibbs, J. W. (1876–1878). On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 3, 108–248, 343–524.
  4. Volterra, V. (1926). Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature, 118(2972), 558–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/118558a0
  5. Gause, G. F. (1934). The struggle for existence. Williams & Wilkins.
  6. Chesson, P. (2000). Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31(1), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct