Construct · 3 names · 4 citations

Where does cyberloafing collide?

Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.

● jangle · one behaviour, many names Nearest construct by meaningcyberdeviancecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to cyberloafing is cyberdeviance.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

cyberloafing3 NAMESCyberloafingLIM · CYBERLOAFINGPersonal web useMAHATANANKOON · PWUCyberslackingVITAK · CYBERSLACKING

Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2002Cyberloafing2004Personal web use2008Cyberslacking
2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Information systems and organizational behavior

Using company internet for personal ends at work

Employees using their organisation's internet access for personal purposes during work hours, named cyberloafing by Lim in 2002 in The IT way of loafing on the job. Lim framed the behaviour as a form of production deviance and explained it through organizational justice and social exchange: workers who feel unfairly treated loaf online to restore balance, and they use neutralisation techniques, such as "everyone does it", to excuse it. This is the anchoring label for the behaviour, tied to a workplace and an employer's connection. The later names on this page point at the same act; they differ in which part of it they foreground, not in what is being done.[1]

Unit
An episode of personal internet use during paid work time
Recovery means
Framed as intermittent: bouts during the workday rather than a stable trait
Measured by
Self-report items counting how often an employee browses, emails, or shops online for personal reasons at work

Information systems

Personal web use and non-work computing at work

The same behaviour renamed personal web usage, or non-work-related computing, and treated as a measurement problem by Mahatanankoon, Anandarajan, and Igbaria in 2004 when they built a scale for it. Where Lim foregrounded deviance and justice, this label is deliberately more neutral: it catalogues what people actually do online at work, such as personal communication, shopping, browsing, and downloading, without first deciding whether it is wrong. The referent is identical to cyberloafing, an employee's personal internet activity on the job, but the name drops the loafing judgement and keeps only the description. Studies that treat personal web usage and cyberloafing as different variables are usually splitting one behaviour along a difference in tone.[2]

Unit
A category of personal online activity performed at work
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
A multidimensional personal web usage scale grouping activities such as communication, shopping, and browsing

Communication and management

personal internet use at work, also framed as cyberslacking or workplace internet deviance.

The behaviour under two more names: cyberslacking, used by Vitak, Crouse, and LaRose in 2011 for personal internet use at work, and workplace internet deviance, the framing Blanchard and Henle used in 2008 when they sorted cyberloafing into minor and serious forms. Cyberslacking leans on the idea of shirking, that time online is time stolen from tasks, while workplace internet deviance leans on the idea of rule-breaking, that the activity violates workplace norms. Both point at the same act as Lim's cyberloafing and Mahatanankoon and colleagues' personal web usage. The proliferation of labels, slacking, deviance, loafing, abuse, is the jangle: the underlying behaviour is one, and the choice of name mostly signals how harshly the author intends to judge it.[3][4]

Unit
An instance of non-work internet activity during work
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Self-report scales of personal internet use, often split into minor and serious or deviant forms

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how cyberloafing sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

self-control4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one term, three theoriescyberdeviance4 names · 5 citationsjangle · one construct, many named facetsanchoring3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
  2. Mahatanankoon, P., Anandarajan, M., & Igbaria, M. (2004). Development of a measure of personal web usage in the workplace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493104322820165
  3. Vitak, J., Crouse, J., & LaRose, R. (2011). Personal Internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1751–1759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.03.002
  4. Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.008

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct