Construct · 3 fields · 5 citations

Where does browsing collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningforagingcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to browsing is foraging.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

browsing3 CONSTRUCTSBrowse (herbivory)HOFMANN · WOODY BROWSEBrowsing (seeking)BATES · EXPLORATORY SEEKBrowsing (shopping)BLOCH · RECREATIONAL SHOP

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Ecology

Herbivory on woody plants

In ecology, browsing is the feeding of a herbivore on the leaves, twigs, shoots, and bark of woody plants and shrubs, as opposed to grazing on grasses and low herbaceous growth. Hofmann and Stewart (1972), in Grazer or browser: A classification based on the stomach-structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants, sorted ruminants into browsers, grazers, and intermediate feeders by gut anatomy and diet, and Hofmann's (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants set out the physiological basis of that split. The referent here is an animal's diet of woody plant parts, not a human way of looking through information or a shopper moving through a store.[1][2]

Unit
One animal's intake of woody plant parts (leaves, twigs, shoots, bark)
Recovery means
Browsed woody plants can regrow shoots and foliage after defoliation
Measured by
Assessed by rumen or fecal analysis, bite counts, and the share of woody browse in the diet

Information science

an exploratory way of seeking information by scanning what is available and following what looks promising, not a precise query.

In information science, browsing is an informal, exploratory way of seeking information by scanning what is available and following what looks promising, rather than issuing a precise query. Bates (1989), in The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface, modeled searching as an evolving path in which a seeker gathers pieces while browsing, and Marchionini (1995), in Information seeking in electronic environments, gave the widely used account of browsing as an opportunistic, interactive strategy that contrasts with analytical query-based search. The referent is a human way of looking for information, not an animal's diet or a retail activity.[3][4]

Unit
One episode of scanning and following information without a fixed query
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Traced through interaction and click logs, dwell time, path length, and think-aloud accounts of seeking

Consumer behavior and marketing

examining a retailer's merchandise for recreation or information without an immediate intention to buy.

In consumer behavior, browsing is the examination of a retailer's merchandise for recreation or information without an immediate intention to buy. Bloch, Ridgway, and Sherrell (1989), in Extending the concept of shopping: An investigation of browsing activity, defined and measured this activity and separated it from goal-directed prepurchase search, and later work carried the idea into online stores. The referent is a shopper's in-store or on-site activity, not an animal feeding on woody plants or a person looking for information in a library or database.[5]

Unit
One shopper's session of examining merchandise without immediate buying intent
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Captured by time in store, self-reported browsing scales, and, online, page views and session dwell time

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how browsing sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

foraging3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsattention5 fields · 10 citationsjingle · one name, five constructsrelevance6 fields · 13 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Hofmann, R. R., & Stewart, D. R. M. (1972). Grazer or browser: A classification based on the stomach-structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants. Mammalia, 36(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1972.36.2.226
  2. Hofmann, R. R. (1989). Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: A comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia, 78(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378733
  3. Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320
  4. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626388
  5. Bloch, P. H., Ridgway, N. M., & Sherrell, D. L. (1989). Extending the concept of shopping: An investigation of browsing activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726349

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct