Construct · 4 fields · 7 citations

Where does elimination collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningpivotcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to elimination is pivot.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

elimination4 CONSTRUCTSGaussian eliminationGAUSS · ROW REDUCTIONElimination reactionHOFMANN · ELIMINATIONBackward eliminationEFROYMSON · STEPWISEElim. by aspectsTVERSKY · CHOICE RULE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Mathematics and linear algebra

Row reduction of a linear system

Gaussian elimination is a systematic procedure for solving a system of linear equations by using row operations to remove one unknown at a time until the system is triangular and can be solved by back-substitution. Gauss described the method in 1810 while computing the orbit of the asteroid Pallas from redundant observations, applying it to the normal equations of least squares. Grcar's 2011 historical review Mathematicians of Gaussian elimination traced the algorithm and noted that equivalent elimination of unknowns was used long before Gauss, by Chinese mathematicians and by Newton, with Gauss standardising the notation. The referent here is an algorithm on numbers arranged in a matrix, counted in arithmetic operations, and it has nothing to do with removing atoms from a molecule, dropping predictors from a statistical model, or discarding options in a choice.[1][2]

Unit
One run of the algorithm on a coefficient matrix, scaled by its number of rows and columns
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by operation count (about two-thirds of n-cubed for an n by n system) and by numerical stability under pivoting

Organic chemistry

Removal of atoms to form a double bond

An elimination reaction removes two atoms or groups from adjacent carbons of a molecule and forms a new double bond in their place, the reverse of an addition. Hofmann reported the first clear case in 1851, heating a quaternary ammonium hydroxide so that it lost an amine and a proton to give an alkene, in the transformation now called Hofmann elimination. Saytzeff's 1875 study of the order of addition and loss of hydrogen iodide in organic compounds established the rule that the more substituted alkene usually predominates. The referent is a chemical transformation of covalent bonds, tracked by product yield and rate, and it is not an algorithm on a matrix, a model-building step in statistics, or a rule for choosing among options.[3][4]

Unit
One conversion of a substrate into an unsaturated product by loss of a leaving group and an adjacent atom
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Followed by reaction rate, product distribution, and the ratio of the more to the less substituted alkene

Statistics

Stepwise removal of predictors

Backward elimination is a variable-selection procedure that begins with every candidate predictor in a regression model and then repeatedly deletes the least useful one until a stopping rule is met. Efroymson set out the computational stepwise version in 1960 for early digital computers, and Draper and Smith's Applied Regression Analysis gave the standard textbook treatment of the forward, backward, and stepwise variants. The referent is a model-building step that discards columns of data, judged by significance tests or information criteria, and it is unrelated to solving a linear system, breaking a chemical bond, or ruling out choices.[5][6]

Unit
One deletion step that drops a single predictor from the current model
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Guided by partial F tests, p-value thresholds, or information criteria such as AIC at each step

Decision theory and psychology

Screening options out by attribute

Elimination by aspects is a model of how people choose among options by attributes rather than by an overall score: at each stage the chooser picks an aspect, often weighted by its importance, and discards every option that lacks it, until one remains. Tversky introduced the theory in 1972 in Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice, showing that it can violate the principle that adding an option should not change the relative ranking of the others. The referent is a psychological decision rule that eliminates alternatives, studied through observed choices, and it does not describe row reduction, a chemical bond change, or the pruning of a regression model.[7]

Unit
One choice among a set of options, described by the aspects used to screen them
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated from choice probabilities across option sets and tested against the constant-ratio and regularity conditions

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how elimination sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

reaction4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsregression4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsselection4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Gauss, C. F. (1810). Disquisitio de elementis ellipticis Palladis. Göttingen: Commentationes Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Gottingensis.
  2. Grcar, J. F. (2011). Mathematicians of Gaussian elimination. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(6), 782–792.
  3. von Hofmann, A. W. (1851). Beiträge zur Kenntniss der flüchtigen organischen Basen. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 78, 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.18510780302
  4. Saytzeff, A. (1875). Zur Kenntniss der Reihenfolge der Anlagerung und Ausscheidung der Jodwasserstoffelemente in organischen Verbindungen. Justus Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 179(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlac.18751790304
  5. Efroymson, M. A. (1960). Multiple regression analysis. In A. Ralston & H. S. Wilf (Eds.), Mathematical methods for digital computers (pp. 191–203). Wiley.
  6. Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118625590
  7. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79(4), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032955

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct