Construct · 4 fields · 5 citations

Where does motif collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningpatterncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to motif is pattern.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

motif4 CONSTRUCTSMusical motiveMARX · MELODIC CELLFolklore motifTHOMPSON · TALE ELEMENTStructural motifRICHARDSON · PROTEIN MOTIFNetwork motifMILO · NETWORK MOTIF

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Music theory

Shortest recurring melodic idea

The shortest self-contained musical idea that recurs and develops through a piece, a small group of notes with a distinctive rhythm and shape that a listener recognises when it returns. Adolf Bernhard Marx's 1837 Die Lehre von der musikalischen Komposition set out the Motiv as the smallest meaningful building block of a melody, from which larger phrases are grown, and Rudolph Reti's 1951 The Thematic Process in Music traced how such a cell is varied and transformed to unify a whole work. The referent is a fragment of melody in a score, counted in notes and beats, and it has nothing to do with a recurring element in a folk tale, a conserved shape in a protein, or a frequent wiring pattern in a network.[1][2]

Unit
A short melodic cell of a few notes, described by its pitch shape and rhythm
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by analysis of a score and traced through its repetitions and variations

Folklore and literary studies

Recurring narrative element

The smallest element of a story that recurs across many tales and persists as it is retold, such as a magic object, a cruel stepmother, or a test the hero must pass. Stith Thompson's 1932 Motif-Index of Folk-Literature catalogued these narrative units across world tradition and defined a motif as the smallest part of a tale with the power to survive in circulation. The referent is a repeatable ingredient of narrative, counted by its appearances across stories, and it is distinct from a melodic fragment in music, a conserved pattern in a molecule, or a frequent subgraph in a network.[3]

Unit
A single narrative element, counted by its recurrence across tales
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Indexed and compared across story collections using motif catalogues

Molecular biology

Recurring structural pattern in a macromolecule

A recurring structural pattern within a large biological molecule, a small arrangement of a few secondary-structure elements (such as two strands joined in a hairpin, or the Greek-key and beta-barrel arrangements) that appears again and again in unrelated proteins. Jane Richardson's 1981 The Anatomy and Taxonomy of Protein Structure named and organised these recurring arrangements, giving the structural motif its working vocabulary, and the same word is used for short conserved runs of sequence that mark a functional site. The referent is a physical or sequence pattern in a macromolecule, identified by structure or by conserved residues, and it is unrelated to a musical fragment, a story element, or a network subgraph.[4]

Unit
A recurring structural or sequence pattern within a macromolecule
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Detected by structural comparison or by aligning sequences to find conserved patterns

Network science

Over-represented subgraph pattern

A small pattern of connections, a particular way that a handful of nodes wire together, that appears in a network far more often than it would in a random network of the same size. Milo, Shen-Orr, Itzkovitz, Kashtan, Chklovskii, and Alon's 2002 Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks introduced the term and a method to detect these over-represented subgraphs, finding shared motifs across gene-regulation, neural, ecological, and engineered networks. The referent is a statistically frequent subgraph, counted against a randomised baseline, and it is distinct from a melodic fragment in a score, an element of a folk tale, or a conserved pattern in a protein.[5]

Unit
A small connected subgraph of a few nodes and their links
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Counted in the network and compared with its frequency in randomised networks

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how motif sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

pattern4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructstheme4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsnetwork4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Marx, A. B. (1837). Die Lehre von der musikalischen Komposition, praktisch-theoretisch (Vol. 1). Breitkopf & Härtel.
  2. Reti, R. (1951). The thematic process in music. Macmillan.
  3. Thompson, S. (1932). Motif-index of folk-literature (Vols. 1-6). Indiana University Press.
  4. Richardson, J. S. (1981). The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 34, 167-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60520-3
  5. Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002). Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298(5594), 824-827. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5594.824

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct