Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningchannelcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to richness is channel.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The number of different species found in a defined community or area: it is the simplest measure of biodiversity, a plain count that treats a rare species and a common one alike. Whittaker's 1972 Evolution and measurement of species diversity set richness apart from fuller diversity measures, which also weight how evenly individuals are spread across the species present, so a place can be rich in species yet dominated by a few. The referent here is a tally of kinds of living thing in a habitat, and it has nothing to do with a medium's capacity to carry information or with excess fuel in a burning mixture.[1]
The capacity of a communication medium to carry information and reduce ambiguity, ranked by how well it conveys multiple cues, supports quick back-and-forth, uses natural language, and feels personal. In Daft and Lengel's 1986 media richness theory, set out in Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design, a face-to-face conversation is richer than a phone call, which is richer than a written memo, and managers are expected to match a rich medium to an ambiguous task. The referent is a property of a channel of human communication, judged by the cues it carries, not a count of species in a habitat or the fuel content of a combustible mixture.[2]
How far the fuel-to-air ratio of a combustible mixture exceeds the exact ratio at which all the fuel and all the oxygen would be consumed together. As Heywood's 1988 Internal combustion engine fundamentals describes, a rich mixture holds more fuel than that balanced point and leaves some fuel unburned, while a lean mixture holds excess air, and the departure is captured by the equivalence ratio, which is greater than one for a rich mixture. The referent is the proportion of fuel in a gas mixture about to burn, measured as a ratio, and it shares nothing with a tally of species or the carrying power of a communication channel.[3]
Next
See how richness sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct