Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexedSpokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In traditional grammar a substantive is a noun, a word naming a person, place, thing, or idea, often paired with the adjective as the two halves of the older combined category. Jespersen's The Philosophy of Grammar discusses substantives and adjectives and the criteria that distinguish them. The referent is a part-of-speech category; it shares only the word with a dye's affinity or a branch of law.[1]
In law, substantive law is the body of rules that creates, defines, and governs rights, duties, and liabilities, what the law actually requires, as opposed to procedural law, which governs how those rights are enforced through the courts. Black's Law Dictionary draws exactly this contrast between substantive and procedural law. The referent is a category of legal rules; it has nothing to do with dye affinity or grammatical nouns beyond the shared adjective 'substantive'.[4][2]
In dyeing, substantivity is the affinity a dye has for a fibre directly from the dyebath, without a mordant or a chemical reaction, the property that lets 'substantive' (direct) dyes exhaust onto cotton on their own. Burkinshaw's Theoretical Aspects of Textile Coloration frames substantivity through the dye-to-fibre attraction that drives uptake and governs wash-fastness. The referent is a physico-chemical affinity, sharing only its root with substantive law or the grammarian's substantive.[3]
Next
See how substantive sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct