Construct · 3 fields · 5 citations

Where does trope collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
trope3 CONSTRUCTSFigure of speechQUINTILIAN · TURNTrope (abstract particular)WILLIAMS · TROPE THEORYLiturgical tropeCROCKER · INTERPOLATION

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Rhetoric

A word turned from its literal meaning

In rhetoric a trope is a figure in which a word or phrase is turned away from its ordinary meaning to another, as in metaphor, metonymy, irony, or synecdoche, in contrast to a scheme, which rearranges words without altering their meaning. Quintilian's The orator's education (Institutio oratoria, ca. 95 CE) treats tropes as a distinct class of the ornaments of style, the turnings of meaning, and later handbooks such as Lanham's A handlist of rhetorical terms keep this as the governing meaning. The referent is a semantic swerve in language, catalogued and taught as part of elocutio, and it has nothing structurally in common with an insertion into a chant melody or an abstract property in metaphysics beyond the shared Greek root meaning a turn.[1][2]

Unit
A single turning of a word or phrase from its literal to a figurative meaning
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by classifying a passage's departures from literal meaning into named trope types (metaphor, metonymy, irony, synecdoche, and others)

Metaphysics

A property as a concrete, non-repeatable particular

In analytic metaphysics a trope is a particularised property: not a universal that many things share, but the specific, non-repeatable instance of a quality located in one object, so the redness of this apple is numerically distinct from the redness of that one. Donald C. Williams's The elements of being (originally published 1953) made the trope the basic building block of reality, arguing that objects and universals alike can be analysed as bundles and classes of such particulars. The referent is an ontological primitive in a theory of properties, a technical term of twentieth-century philosophy that happens to share the word with the rhetorician's figure and the musicologist's chant insertion while naming an entirely different construct.[3]

Unit
A single particularised instance of a property in one object
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Not measured empirically; analysed by whether a trope ontology can reconstruct resemblance, predication, and individuation without positing universals

Musicology

Added text or melody interpolated into plainchant

In medieval musicology a trope is an addition to an existing item of liturgical plainchant: new text, new melody, or both, grafted onto a chant of the Mass or Office to amplify or gloss it, a practice that flourished from roughly the ninth to the twelfth centuries. Weakland's The beginnings of troping and Crocker's The troping hypothesis debate how and why these interpolations arose and how troping relates to the sequence. The referent is a concrete compositional accretion in a chant repertory, studied through manuscripts and attributions, and it is unrelated to a figure of speech or a metaphysical particular despite carrying the same name.[4][5]

Unit
A single textual or melodic interpolation attached to a base chant
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Studied by identifying and dating interpolations in chant manuscripts and reconstructing the base chant they embellish

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how trope sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

irony3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsmetaphor3 fields · 3 citationsinvariant · one construct, three systemsmetonymy2 fields · 3 citationsinvariant · one construct, two systems

References

  1. Quintilian. (2001). The orator's education (D. A. Russell, Ed. & Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published ca. 95 CE) ISBN 9780674995918
  2. Lanham, R. A. (1991). A handlist of rhetorical terms (2nd ed.). University of California Press. ISBN 9780520076693
  3. Williams, D. C. (2018). The elements of being. In The elements and patterns of being: Essays in metaphysics. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1953) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810384.003.0003
  4. Weakland, R. (1958). The beginnings of troping. The Musical Quarterly, 44(4), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/mq/xliv.4.477
  5. Crocker, R. L. (1966). The troping hypothesis. The Musical Quarterly, 52(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/mq/lii.2.183

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct