Construct · 1 fields · 4 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningerosioncompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to uniformitarianism is erosion.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
James Hutton's Theory of the Earth (1788, expanded to a two-volume book in 1795) proposed that the features of the Earth can be explained by the same slow natural processes, erosion, deposition, uplift, and volcanism, that can be observed acting today, given enough time. Charles Lyell's Principles of Geology (1830 to 1833) organised this view into the working method of the science, and William Whewell coined the label uniformitarianism for it in 1832; the idea is often summarised as the principle that the present is the key to the past. In its strong form it holds that natural laws are constant across time and space and that the kinds and rates of processes seen now have operated throughout geological history, so no unknown or extinct causes need be invoked to read the rock record. Later work distinguished these claims: Stephen Jay Gould (1965) argued that the constancy of natural law is a background assumption shared by all science, while the claim of uniform rates is an empirical question that need not always hold. What makes uniformitarianism a landmark is its scope: it supplies the interpretive rule that lets present-day processes, and their observed rates, be used to reconstruct events across the vast span of geological time.[1][2][3][4]
Next
See how uniformitarianism sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct