Construct · 4 names · 7 citations

Where does corporate entrepreneurship collide?

Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.

● jangle · one construct, many names Nearest construct by meaningstrategic entrepreneurshipcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to corporate entrepreneurship is strategic entrepreneurship.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

SUBSUMED UNDER CE 1999SUBSUMED UNDER CE 1999corporateentrepreneurship4 NAMESCorporate entrep.SHARMA & CHRISMAN · CEIntrapreneurshipANTONCIC · INTRAPRENEURCorporate venturingBURGELMAN · VENTURINGFirm behaviorCOVIN & SLEVIN · POSTURE

Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Management (umbrella construct)

Entrepreneurial activity inside an established firm

The broad label for entrepreneurial behaviour carried out inside an existing organization rather than by a lone founder starting a new one. Guth and Ginsberg's 1990 introduction to a Strategic Management Journal special issue grouped the topic under two headings, the birth of new businesses within a firm and the transformation of a firm through renewal of its key ideas. Sharma and Chrisman's 1999 Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship then tried to impose order, defining corporate entrepreneurship as the process by which an individual or group, in association with an existing organization, creates a new organization or instigates renewal or innovation within it. The referent is this whole umbrella, and the difficulty on this page is that the same activity is also studied under the separate names intrapreneurship, corporate venturing, and entrepreneurial firm behaviour, each with its own tradition and measure.[1][2]

Unit
An existing firm and the entrepreneurial activity within it
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Coded from case histories and survey scales spanning new-business creation and firm renewal

Organizational behaviour

Employee-driven entrepreneurship within the firm

The label that puts the emphasis on people inside the firm acting like entrepreneurs, pursuing new ventures and ideas from within rather than leaving to found their own company. The term was popularised by Pinchot's 1985 book Intrapreneuring, which framed it as a way to keep entrepreneurial employees and their ideas within a large organization. Antoncic and Hisrich's 2001 Intrapreneurship refined it into a firm-level construct with dimensions such as new venturing, innovativeness, self-renewal, and proactiveness, and built a survey measure validated across two countries. The referent is the same activity the umbrella covers, but the name foregrounds the employee and their initiative, and the literature under this label rarely cites the corporate venturing or firm-behaviour work that describes much the same thing.[3][4]

Unit
A firm, scored on the entrepreneurial initiative of its members
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Antoncic and Hisrich's multidimensional intrapreneurship survey scale

Strategic management

Building new businesses inside an established firm

The label for the narrower activity of creating new businesses within an established corporation, whether by internal development or by investing in ventures. Burgelman's 1983 A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm traced how new business initiatives arise from autonomous action at operating levels and then win, or fail to win, strategic backing from top management. Here the construct is a process that ends in a new business unit or venture, distinct from the broader renewal of an existing one. The referent overlaps heavily with the umbrella and with intrapreneurship, but the name and the tradition focus on the venture as the outcome, and much of this work treats venturing as if it were the whole of corporate entrepreneurship rather than one part of it.[5]

Unit
A single new venture created within an established firm
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Traced through process case studies; counted as venture starts, survival, and returns

Entrepreneurship (firm-level)

A firm's overall entrepreneurial posture and behaviour

The label that treats entrepreneurship as a property of the whole firm's behaviour rather than a discrete venture or a person. Covin and Slevin's 1991 A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior modelled the firm's entrepreneurial posture along the dimensions of innovation, risk-taking, and proactiveness, and argued this posture drives performance in interaction with the environment and firm strategy. Zahra's 1991 Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship measured a closely related firm-level construct spanning innovation, venturing, and renewal, and linked it to later financial results. The referent is the firm's aggregate entrepreneurial behaviour, which grew alongside the entrepreneurial orientation literature, and it names much the same underlying activity as the umbrella, intrapreneurship, and venturing labels, measured as a standing posture rather than a project or a person.[6][7]

Unit
A firm, scored on its aggregate entrepreneurial posture
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Covin and Slevin's firm-behaviour scale; Zahra's corporate entrepreneurship index

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how corporate entrepreneurship sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

entrepreneurial orientation6 names · 10 citationsjangle · two scales, one name, contestedinnovation6 fields · 11 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsinnovativeness6 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300302
  2. Guth, W. D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editors' introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Special Issue), 5–15.
  3. Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3
  4. Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don't have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. Harper & Row. ISBN 9780060153052
  5. Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392619
  6. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
  7. Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-A

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct