Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations

Where does forcing collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningregression discontinuitycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to forcing is regression discontinuity.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

forcing3 CONSTRUCTSForcing variableTHISTLETHWAITE · CUTOFFForcing (logic)COHEN · INDEPENDENCERadiative forcingHANSEN · RADIATIVE W/M2

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Econometrics and program evaluation

The covariate that assigns treatment at a cutoff

Thistlethwaite and Campbell's 1960 Regression-discontinuity analysis introduced a design in which units receive a treatment only when a measured score crosses a fixed cutoff, so that comparing units just above and just below the threshold estimates the treatment's effect. In modern econometrics that score is called the forcing variable, the running score whose value alone decides who is treated (Lee & Lemieux, 2010). Here forcing names a data column in an observational study, the quantity that pushes a case onto one side of a boundary, and it has nothing to do with a proof method in logic or a perturbation of the planet's heat budget.[1][2]

Unit
One observation's value on the assignment score relative to the cutoff
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Recorded as the running score, with the treatment effect estimated from the jump in outcomes at the cutoff

Mathematical logic and set theory

A method for building models to prove independence

Paul Cohen's 1963 The independence of the continuum hypothesis introduced forcing, a method for extending a model of set theory by adjoining a carefully controlled new object, so that a target statement can be made to hold or fail in the enlarged model. Building on the constructible universe of Gödel, forcing let Cohen prove that the continuum hypothesis can be neither proved nor disproved from the standard axioms, and it became the central tool for independence results in mathematical logic. In this field forcing is a construction on formal structures, unrelated to a variable that assigns treatment in a study or to an energy imbalance driving the climate.[3]

Unit
A single forcing construction over a given model of set theory
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Carried out as a proof, verifying which statements hold in the extended model

Climate science

An imposed perturbation to Earth's energy balance

Hansen, Sato, and Ruedy's 1997 Radiative forcing and climate response defined radiative forcing as an externally imposed change in the balance between incoming solar energy and outgoing heat at the top of the atmosphere, measured in watts per square meter. A positive forcing, such as added carbon dioxide, traps heat and warms the surface until the balance is restored, and putting different influences on this common scale lets them be ranked by their warming power. Here forcing is a physical quantity of energy flux acting on the whole planet, not a statistical cutoff variable or a model-building step in set theory.[4]

Unit
A change in net energy flux at the top of the atmosphere, in watts per square meter
Recovery means
The surface warms or cools until outgoing heat rebalances the imposed change
Measured by
Computed from radiative transfer models and observations of greenhouse gases, aerosols, and solar output

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how forcing sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

treatment1 fields · 1 citationsanchor · a standalone constructassignment3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsdriver2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Thistlethwaite, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1960). Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(6), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044319
  2. Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.2.281
  3. Cohen, P. J. (1963). The independence of the continuum hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 50(6), 1143–1148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.50.6.1143
  4. Hansen, J., Sato, M., & Ruedy, R. (1997). Radiative forcing and climate response. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 102(D6), 6831–6864. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03436

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct