Construct · 1 fields · 2 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaningintelligencecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to hybrid intelligence is intelligence.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Dominik Dellermann, Philipp Ebel, Matthias Söllner, and Jan Marco Leimeister defined the construct in 2019 in Business & Information Systems Engineering as the ability to achieve complex goals by combining human and artificial intelligence, so the collective reaches outcomes neither could reach alone and the two continually learn from each other. The framing is deliberately socio-technical: rather than treating AI as a replacement for human judgment or humans as a stopgap for imperfect AI, hybrid intelligence treats the pairing itself as the unit of design, each party compensating for the other's characteristic weaknesses: human common sense and context against machine scale and consistency. Dellermann and colleagues (2019, HICSS) developed the companion design-knowledge taxonomy for building such systems. The construct is distinctive because its object is the human-machine collective as a designed capability, and it sits in the information-systems tradition of socio-technical design rather than in artificial intelligence as such.[1][2]
Next
See how hybrid intelligence sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct