Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one label, four levels of analysis Nearest construct by meaningnational culturecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to long-term orientation is national culture.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A dimension on which whole societies differ: cultures high on it emphasise perseverance, thrift, and ordering relationships by status, and cultures low on it emphasise tradition, saving face, and meeting present social obligations. Hofstede and Bond's 1988 The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth derived it from a Chinese Value Survey and named it Confucian dynamism, later folding it into Hofstede's model as long-term versus short-term orientation and scoring it as a national index. The referent here is a property of a country's shared values, estimated by averaging survey responses across many people, not a trait of one shopper, one firm, or one trading relationship.[1]
A personal difference in how much weight someone gives to the future consequences of present choices, treated as a trait that varies from person to person and predicts decisions such as saving, planning, and delaying reward. Bearden, Money, and Nevins's 2006 A measure of long-term orientation: Development and validation built a short self-report scale with tradition and planning components and validated it at the level of the individual respondent. The referent is a measured attribute of one person, not the averaged values of a nation, so a high national score does not tell you where any given citizen falls.[2]
The tendency of a firm, especially a family-owned one, to prioritise distant outcomes and the interests of future generations over immediate returns, shaping how it invests, hires, and chooses between sooner and later payoffs. Lumpkin and Brigham's 2011 Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms framed it through the components of futurity, continuity, and perseverance, and tied it to how such firms trade present cost against future benefit. The referent is a strategic disposition of an organisation, inferred from its decisions and stated priorities, not a survey value of a country or a personality score of one consumer.[3]
The degree to which a buyer or seller values the future of a specific exchange relationship and works to sustain it, rather than maximising the gains of the current transaction. Ganesan's 1994 Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships modelled it as an outcome of trust and mutual dependence between two trading parties and measured it at the level of the relationship itself. The referent is a property of a dyad, a bond between two specific partners, so it can be high between one buyer and seller and low between the same firm and a different one, unlike a fixed national or personal score.[4]
Next
See how long-term orientation sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct