Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaninggenotypecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to mutation is genotype.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A heritable change in an organism's genetic material, from a single base substitution (a point mutation) to a larger rearrangement, passed on to daughter cells or offspring. Working before the structure of DNA was known, Muller showed in 1927 that X-rays raise the rate of such changes in Drosophila, establishing mutation as a physical event in the gene that could be induced and counted rather than only inferred. The referent is a lineage of cells or organisms, and the unit is an alteration in the DNA sequence itself; what makes something a mutation here is that the sequence changed and the change is transmissible. This is the only meaning on the page where the thing that mutates is a physical molecule and the change is as often unwanted as not.[1]
A fault introduced into a program on purpose, a mutant, seeded to test whether a test suite would notice it. DeMillo, Lipton, and Sayward proposed mutation testing in 1978: make many small altered copies of a program, each with one changed operator or constant, then run the existing tests. A suite that fails on a mutant has killed it, and the fraction of mutants killed is a mutation score that grades the tests, not the program. The referent is a test suite and the unit is one injected fault; the change is introduced deliberately and is meant to be caught, the reverse of the genetics meaning, where the change is a fact of nature to be detected after it has happened.[2]
A random perturbation applied to a candidate solution inside a genetic algorithm, flipping a bit or nudging a value so the search can reach regions that crossover alone would miss. Holland's 1975 account of adaptation in natural and artificial systems treats mutation as one of the operators acting on a population of encoded solutions, a low-probability source of new variation that keeps the search from converging too early. The referent is a point in a search space and the unit is a change to its encoding; the change is neither a molecular event nor a seeded defect but a tunable knob whose only job is to widen exploration. It borrows the biological word by analogy and keeps almost none of the biology.[3]
A rule-governed change to the initial consonant of a word, triggered by the grammatical or phonological context around it rather than by any change in the word's meaning. In the Celtic languages, and Welsh especially, a word's first sound shifts across a fixed set of alternations (soft, nasal, and aspirate mutation) depending on what precedes it, so the same lexical item surfaces with different opening consonants. Ball and Müller's account of mutation in Welsh treats this as a morphophonological system rather than a historical accident. The referent is a word form in context and the unit is an alternation at the word's edge; nothing is damaged, injected, or inherited, which sets it apart from every other meaning here.[4]
Next
See how mutation sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct