Construct · 3 names · 3 citations
Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.
● jangle · ready to adopt, measured many ways Nearest construct by meaningreadinesscompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to organizational readiness is readiness.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The degree to which an organization has the financial and technological resources needed to adopt a new information technology, treated by Iacovou, Benbasat, and Dexter in 1995 as one of three factors, alongside perceived benefits and external pressure, that drive electronic data interchange adoption in small firms. Financial readiness is the capital available to install and run the system; technological readiness is the sophistication of the firm's existing IT and the expertise to manage it. Here organizational readiness is a matter of resources and capability, an objective feature of the firm rather than a state of mind, and it governs whether a small organization can act on the benefits it perceives and the pressure it feels.[1]
The degree to which an organization is prepared, in its awareness, resources, commitment, and governance, to adopt and conduct electronic commerce: the organizational context of the technology, organization, and environment framework, cast as e-readiness. Molla and Licker built the Perceived e-Readiness Model in 2005 and defined Perceived Organizational e-Readiness as a firm's own assessment of its preparedness across those dimensions, held apart from the external e-readiness of its market and supporting industries. Readiness here widens past money and machines to take in managerial commitment and internal governance, yet it stays a property of the organization, measured to predict whether the firm will adopt and institutionalize e-business.[2]
The extent to which an organization's members are collectively prepared, psychologically and behaviorally, to implement a change, defined by Weiner in 2009 as organizational readiness for change and built from two shared beliefs: change commitment, the members' shared resolve to pursue the change, and change efficacy, their shared belief that they can enact it together. Readiness emerges as a shared property when members value the change and judge the task, resource, and situational demands to be manageable. Unlike the resource view, this readiness lives in the collective state of mind of the people who must carry the change out, and it governs the effort, persistence, and cooperation they bring to implementation.[3]
Next
See how organizational readiness sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct