Construct · 3 names · 4 citations

Where does planogram collide?

Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.

● jangle · one shelf problem, several named practices Nearest construct by meaningword of mouthcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to planogram is word of mouth.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

planogram3 NAMESSpace elasticityDRÈZE · SPACE ELASTICITYCategory mgmtBASUROY · CATEGORY MGMTPlanogramHÜBNER · PLANOGRAM

Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Marketing and retailing

the responsiveness of a product's unit sales to the shelf space or number of facings it is given.

The measured responsiveness of a product's unit sales to the amount of shelf room, or number of facings, it is given: adding space usually lifts sales, but by less and less, so the relationship is captured as an elasticity that says how much room each item earns. Curhan's 1972 study The Relationship between Shelf Space and Unit Sales in Supermarkets was among the first to measure this link across grocery categories, and Drèze, Hoch, and Purk's 1994 Shelf management and space elasticity turned it into a rule for allocating space to maximise category profit. Here the thing referred to is a statistical coefficient estimated from sales data, and it differs from the retailer and supplier practice of category management and from the drawn planogram, which are the same shelf problem approached as a strategy and as a diagram rather than as a measured number.[1][2]

Unit
One estimated elasticity linking a product's facings to its unit sales
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated by regressing unit sales on shelf facings across stores, or from controlled changes in space

Retail management

Manage the whole category as a unit

The practice of treating a whole product category, such as coffee or laundry care, as a single strategic business unit that a retailer and a lead supplier plan together, coordinating which items to stock, how to price them, and how much shelf room each receives. Basuroy, Mantrala, and Walters's 2001 The Impact of Category Management on Retailer Prices and Performance laid out the practice and showed how it moves retail prices and category profit. Here the thing referred to is an organisational routine for governing a category, and it is wider than the space-elasticity coefficient and the physical planogram, which it takes as inputs: the same shelf-space problem seen as a management process rather than as a number or a picture.[3]

Unit
One category run as a jointly planned business unit by retailer and supplier
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by category sales, margin, and price outcomes before and after the practice is adopted

Retail operations

a visual diagram fixing where each product sits on a fixture, including which shelf, position, and how many facings.

The planogram proper is the visual diagram that fixes exactly where each product sits on a fixture: which shelf, which position, and how many facings, so that an abstract space allocation becomes a concrete, buildable layout a store can put up and audit. Hübner and Kuhn's 2012 review Retail category management surveyed the optimisation models and commercial software that generate these layouts, and noted the gap between the academic models and the simpler rules the software actually uses. Here the thing referred to is the placement diagram and the operations tooling that produces it, the tangible output of the same shelf problem that space elasticity measures and category management governs.[4]

Unit
One shelf-by-shelf placement diagram for a fixture or category
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Evaluated by compliance audits and by the sales and space productivity of the built layout

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how planogram sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

atmospherics3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructspositioning4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructssalience4 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Curhan, R. C. (1972). The relationship between shelf space and unit sales in supermarkets. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377200900408
  2. Drèze, X., Hoch, S. J., & Purk, M. E. (1994). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(94)90002-7
  3. Basuroy, S., Mantrala, M. K., & Walters, R. G. (2001). The impact of category management on retailer prices and performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.4.16.18382
  4. Hübner, A. H., & Kuhn, H. (2012). Retail category management: State-of-the-art review of quantitative research and software applications in assortment and shelf space management. Omega, 40(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.05.008

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct