Construct · 1 fields · 3 citations
One name. One construct. A landmark on the map.
● anchor · a standalone construct Nearest construct by meaninggenotypecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to pleiotropy is genotype.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
A single standalone construct; nearby constructs are located against it in the Collider. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
The German zoologist Ludwig Plate coined the term pleiotropie in 1910 to name the case in which a single gene, the unit of heredity, influences two or more distinct and often unrelated traits of an organism. A trait here is any measurable feature, from a pigment to a behaviour, and pleiotropy holds when one genetic cause reaches several such features at once rather than only one. George C. Williams (1957) gave the construct its most cited evolutionary form, antagonistic pleiotropy, in which one gene raises fitness early in life while lowering it later, an argument that grounds a leading genetic account of why organisms age. What makes pleiotropy a landmark is its scope: it ties a single locus to a spread of phenotypic effects, so it constrains how independently traits can evolve and recurs across the study of development, disease, and senescence. It is identified when variation at one gene is shown to change several phenotypes together.[1][2][3]
Next
See how pleiotropy sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct