Construct · 4 names · 5 citations
Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.
● jangle · the bounded self, or the connected self Nearest construct by meaningculturecompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to self-construal is culture.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The degree to which a person construes the self as independent, a bounded and autonomous entity defined by its own internal traits, or as interdependent, a self connected to others and defined by roles and relationships. This is the origin of the construct. Markus and Kitayama's 1991 Culture and the self argued that these two construals, cultivated respectively in many Western and in many East Asian and other non-Western settings, shape cognition, emotion, and motivation: what a person attends to, which feelings they report, and what drives them all follow from whether the self is felt as separate or embedded. The referent is a self-schema carried by an individual, the construct that every later field on this map inherited and put to its own use.[1]
Self-construal recast as the individual-level counterpart of individualism-collectivism: the disposition to see oneself as an independent or an interdependent person, carried within a culture rather than defining it. Triandis's 1989 The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts distinguished the private, public, and collective self and tied their sampling to context, and this line of work separated the culture-level dimension from its personal analogues, idiocentrism and allocentrism. Singelis's 1994 Self-Construal Scale then operationalized the two construals as coexisting dimensions measured inside the person. What differs from the parent field is the level of analysis: here self-construal is the individual variable that must not be equated with the culture-level dimension it descends from.[2][3]
Self-construal as a moderator of how consumers process and respond to marketing: whether an advertisement, appeal, or brand fits the way the reader construes the self. Aaker and Lee's 2001 "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains showed that people with an accessible independent self attend to and better remember promotion-framed, approach-oriented information, while those with an interdependent self favor prevention-framed, avoidance-oriented information, so a message persuades best when its regulatory focus matches the active construal. The referent is the same independent or interdependent self, now treated as a lever on advertising response, brand preference, and persuasion, and in this field usually primed rather than measured as a trait.[4]
Self-construal as the individual-level mediator between culture and how people talk: whether someone favors direct, low-context speech or indirect, face-sensitive, high-context speech. Gudykunst and colleagues' 1996 The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures found that independent self-construals predicted low-context, direct communication and interdependent self-construals predicted high-context, indirect communication, and that self-construals mediated the effect of a culture's individualism-collectivism on a person's style. The referent is again the independent or interdependent self, here the variable that carries a culture's broad orientation down to an individual's concern for face and choice of directness.[5]
Next
See how self-construal sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct