Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations

Where does stacking collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
stacking3 CONSTRUCTSSeismic stackingMAYNE · CRPπ-stackingHUNTER-SANDERS · πStacked generalizationWOLPERT · 1992

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Reflection seismology

summing seismic traces that record the same subsurface point from different offsets, cancelling random noise.

In reflection seismology, stacking is the summation of many seismic traces that record the same subsurface point from different source-receiver offsets; because the reflected signal is coherent across those traces while the noise is not, adding them cancels random noise and sharpens the image. Mayne's 1962 Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques introduced common-reflection-point stacking, still the backbone of seismic imaging. The referent is a noise-reduction operation on redundant geophysical recordings, unrelated to aromatic chemistry or ensemble learning save for the word.[1]

Unit
The signal-to-noise gain from summing redundant traces at a common point
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Judged by the signal-to-noise improvement in the stacked section versus single traces

Chemistry

the attractive noncovalent interaction that arranges aromatic rings in parallel face-to-face or offset geometries.

In chemistry, stacking (π-stacking) is the attractive noncovalent interaction between aromatic rings that leads them to arrange in parallel face-to-face or offset geometries, an organising force in DNA base pairs, protein folds, and molecular crystals. Hunter and Sanders' 1990 The nature of π-π interactions gave the electrostatic model that explains why the rings favour an offset rather than a perfectly eclipsed stack. The referent is a geometric, energetic relationship between molecules, a wholly different construct from summing seismic traces or combining predictive models.[2]

Unit
The interaction energy and geometry between stacked aromatic rings
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Quantified by interaction energies and ring-offset geometries from spectroscopy and computation

Machine learning

an ensemble method training a meta-learner to combine the predictions of several different base models.

In machine learning, stacking (stacked generalization) is an ensemble method that trains a higher-level meta-learner to combine the predictions of several different base models, learning how much to trust each one rather than weighting them equally. Wolpert's 1992 Stacked generalization introduced the scheme as a way to reduce the generalization error of any single learner. The referent is a layered model-combination procedure, sharing only its name with seismic trace summation and aromatic-ring interactions.[3]

Unit
The meta-learner's combined output over several base models
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Measured by the stacked ensemble's generalization error against the base models it combines

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how stacking sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

base3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsbraid2 fields · 2 citationsinvariant · one construct, three systemschord3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Mayne, W. H. (1962). Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques. Geophysics, 27(6), 927–938. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439118
  2. Hunter, C. A., & Sanders, J. K. M. (1990). The nature of π-π interactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 112(14), 5525–5534. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00170a016
  3. Wolpert, D. H. (1992). Stacked generalization. Neural Networks, 5(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80023-1

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct