Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations
One name. One construct. Different systems. One map.
● invariant · one construct, three systems Nearest construct by meaning·not indexedSpokes are the systems the one construct recurs in; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In the study of social insects, a superorganism is a colony (of ants, honey bees, wasps or termites) so integrated that it behaves as a single organism, with the queen as reproductive line, workers as the somatic body, and coordinated functions like nutrition, defence and thermoregulation emerging at the colony level. Wheeler's 1911 The ant-colony as an organism argued this case explicitly, and Hölldobler and Wilson's The superorganism is the modern synthesis of colony-level organisation and its evolution. The referent is a cohesive society treated as a higher-level individual, characterised by colony-level traits and the suppression of within-colony conflict, the same idea that was applied to plant communities and later formalised in evolutionary theory.[1][2]
In early plant ecology the same organismal picture was applied to whole vegetation: Clements held that a plant community develops, matures and reproduces like a complex organism, passing through predictable successional stages toward a climax that behaves as an integrated whole. Clements's 1936 Nature and structure of the climax is the mature statement of this community-as-organism view. The referent is a biotic community conceived as a single super-individual, and although it is the same borrowed construct as the insect superorganism, we flag that later ecologists (notably Gleason and Tansley) largely rejected this version in favour of individualistic and ecosystem concepts, so here it is a historically important but contested application rather than settled theory.[3]
Evolutionary biology turned the superorganism into a precise question: under what conditions does a collection of lower-level units become a single evolutionary individual? Queller and Strassmann's 2009 Beyond society: The evolution of organismality proposes that organismality rises with high cooperation among the parts and low conflict between them, placing insect colonies, multicellular bodies and symbioses on one continuum. The referent is the degree to which any group qualifies as an organism, scored by cooperation and conflict, and it is the same recurring construct as Wheeler's colony and Clements's community, now given a general, measurable footing.[4]
Next
See how superorganism sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this entryCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct