Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningtokencompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to tokenization is token.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In natural language processing, tokenization is the first step that breaks a stream of raw text into tokens, the small units a model actually reads, such as words, subwords, or characters. Webster and Kit's 1992 Tokenization as the initial phase in NLP set out this segmentation as the foundation on which later analysis depends, and later subword methods, such as the byte-pair encoding of Sennrich, Haddow, and Birch's 2016 Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units, learn a vocabulary of frequent character sequences so that rare and unseen words can still be represented. The referent is an operation that cuts text into processable pieces, and it has nothing to do with hiding sensitive data behind a stand-in or recording ownership of an asset on a ledger.[1][2]
In data security, tokenization replaces a sensitive data element, such as a payment card number, with a non-sensitive substitute called a token that carries no exploitable value on its own, so the real data can be pulled out of a working system and held separately. Díaz-Santiago, Rodríguez-Henríquez, and Chakraborty's 2016 A cryptographic study of tokenization systems gave a formal treatment of these systems and contrasted them with encryption, where the protected value is a reversible transformation of the original rather than an unrelated stand-in mapped through a secured table. The referent is a protective substitution that keeps secrets out of harm's way, not a way of cutting text into units or of registering an asset's ownership.[3]
In finance and blockchain, asset tokenization represents ownership of a real-world or financial asset, such as property, a bond, or a company share, as digital tokens recorded on a distributed ledger, so the asset can be divided into small fractions and traded as those tokens. Lambert, Liebau, and Roosenboom's 2021 Security token offerings studied how firms raise capital by issuing such tokens as regulated claims on assets or cash flows, and how these offerings differ from earlier unregulated coin sales. The referent is a claim on value written onto a ledger and moved between owners, not a substitute that hides sensitive data or a unit that a language model reads.[4]
Next
See how tokenization sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct