Construct · 3 fields · 6 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningfundamental attribution errorcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to attribution is fundamental attribution error.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
The assignment of credit for a conversion across the touchpoints a customer met on the way to buying: an ad, a search click, an email, a store visit. Simple rules give all the credit to the last click or the first click, while multi-touch and data-driven models spread it across the path. Shao and Li's 2011 Data-driven multi-touch attribution models framed this as a measurement problem of estimating each channel's causal contribution from observed journeys, and Kannan, Reinartz, and Verhoef reviewed the modeling that followed. The referent is a bookkeeping of marketing credit across a purchase path, not a person's explanation of behavior, a statistical test of human influence on climate, or a scholar's judgment of who painted a picture.[1][2]
The formal statistical assessment of how far observed changes in the climate can be assigned to human influence rather than to natural variability. Detection establishes that a change is unlikely to be due to internal variability alone, and attribution matches the observed pattern to the expected spatial and temporal fingerprints of forcings, using models and observations together. Hegerl and Zwiers's 2011 Use of models in detection and attribution of climate change set out the fingerprinting framework and its optimal-detection statistics. The referent is a quantitative causal claim about a physical system, weighed in likelihoods and confidence, not a marketing credit split, a mental explanation of behavior, or a connoisseur's authorship call.[6]
Next
See how attribution sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct
Social psychology
how ordinary people explain the causes of behavior and events, crediting a person's disposition or the situation.How ordinary people explain the causes of behavior and events, and in particular whether they credit a person's disposition or the situation. Heider's 1958 The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations opened the field, Kelley's covariation model set out how observers weigh consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus, and Ross named the fundamental attribution error, the tendency to over-credit character and under-credit circumstance. The referent is a folk process of causal explanation in the perceiver's mind, studied for its systematic biases, and it shares nothing with an analyst's tally of marketing credit, a climate fingerprint, or an art expert's verdict beyond the word.[3][4][5]