Construct · 4 fields · 5 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningsealcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to covenant is seal.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A covenant is a formal binding promise, most often written into a deed, that requires or forbids some use of a piece of land and that attaches to the land itself, so it binds later owners rather than only the two people who first agreed to it. A real or restrictive covenant can limit a plot to housing, forbid building, or require upkeep, and courts have enforced such promises against successors since Tulk v Moxhay (1848); French's 1982 Toward a Modern Law of Servitudes: Reweaving the Ancient Strands reworked the doctrine that decides when a promise passes with ownership. The referent is a legal obligation fixed to a parcel of land and enforced between property owners, not a clause in a loan, a founding pact of a state, or a bond between a deity and a people.[1]
A covenant is a condition written into a loan or bond agreement that constrains what the borrower may do while the debt is outstanding, so the lender is protected against actions that would erode the value of the claim. Affirmative covenants require the borrower to act, for example to keep insurance or file accounts, while negative or restrictive covenants forbid actions such as taking on more debt or paying large dividends, and a loan with few such terms is called covenant-lite; Smith and Warner's 1979 On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants set out how these clauses reduce the conflict between shareholders and lenders. The referent is a contractual promise inside a financing agreement, tested against the borrower's numbers, not an obligation running with land, a pact founding authority, or a divine bond.[2]
A covenant is the mutual agreement by which people, to escape the insecurity of life without a common power, lay down their natural right and authorise a sovereign to act for them, which for the argument's purpose grounds political authority and obligation. Hobbes's 1651 Leviathan built the state on such a covenant, where each person agrees with every other to submit to one ruling power, and Hampton's 1986 analysis reconstructed the reasoning that is meant to make this agreement rational and binding. The referent is a founding act of consent studied as an argument about why subjects owe obedience, not a promise attached to land, a clause in a debt contract, or a relationship between a deity and a people.[3][4]
In the academic study of religion a covenant is the binding relationship, framed in the texts as a solemn agreement with stipulations, blessings, and curses, that ties a deity to a chosen people and sets out mutual obligations. Mendenhall's 1954 Covenant Forms in Israelite Tradition is a landmark comparative reading that showed how the biblical covenant echoes the wording of ancient Near Eastern suzerainty treaties between a great king and his vassals, a scholarly analysis of the concept rather than a statement of belief. The referent is a religious bond examined through textual and historical comparison, not a promise running with land, a term in a loan, or a pact founding a state.[5]
Next
See how covenant sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct