Construct · 3 fields · 5 citations

Where does iconicity collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningiconcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to iconicity is icon.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

iconicity3 CONSTRUCTSIconicity (sign)PEIRCE · MOTIVATED SIGNIconic imageHARIMAN · ICONIC IMAGEIconicityTAUB · SIGN LANGUAGE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Linguistics and semiotics

A form that resembles its meaning

In linguistics and semiotics, iconicity is a resemblance or motivated fit between the form of a sign and its meaning, so that the shape of a word, gesture, or sign in some way pictures what it stands for. Charles Sanders Peirce, in his logic papers gathered in 1932, divided signs into the icon, which resembles its object, the index, which points to it, and the symbol, which is tied to it only by convention, and later work such as Dingemanse and colleagues' 2015 review showed that spoken and signed languages are shot through with such motivated mappings alongside arbitrary ones. Here the word names a relation between a form and a meaning, not a fading picture held in the eye for an instant nor a photograph that a whole public treats as emblematic.[1][2][3]

Unit
One form-to-meaning mapping in a word, gesture, or sign, weighed for how much the form resembles the meaning
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Elicited by iconicity ratings, guessing tasks, and structural analysis of how a form maps onto its meaning

Media and visual culture

An image's emblematic public status

In media and visual culture, iconicity is the status an image reaches when a public treats it as emblematic: a single photograph or picture that is widely recognized, reproduced, and felt to condense a shared event or value. Robert Hariman and John Louis Lucaites, in their 2003 study of the 'accidental napalm' photograph, analysed how certain news images become icons that carry public identity and collective memory. Here the word marks an image's cultural weight and recognisability, which need not rest on any special resemblance, and it differs from a form that pictures its meaning or a trace that fades from the eye in an instant.[4]

Unit
One image that a public treats as emblematic of an event or a value
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Gauged by breadth of recognition, frequency of reproduction, and analysis of the public responses an image gathers

Sign language linguistics

sign forms that resemble what they mean, a pervasive property of sign languages.

In sign language linguistics, iconicity refers to sign forms that resemble what they mean, a pervasive property of sign languages. This meaning comes from Taub (2001) in Language from the Body.[5]

Unit
Recovery means
Measured by

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how iconicity sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

sign4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsimage4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsarbitrariness4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsicon2 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, two constructs

References

  1. Peirce, C. S. (1932). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2: Elements of logic (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
  2. Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., & Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.013
  3. Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227
  4. Hariman, R., & Lucaites, J. L. (2003). Public identity and collective memory in U.S. iconic photography: The image of "accidental napalm." Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0739318032000067074
  5. Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the Body. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511040764

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct