Construct · 4 fields · 4 citations

Where does induction collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaninginferencecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to induction is inference.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

induction4 CONSTRUCTSInductive reasoningHUME · PROBABLE INFERENCEMath. inductionBUSSEY · PROOF FOR ALL NEM inductionFARADAY · CHANGING FIELDEmbryonic inductionSPEMANN · CELL FATE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Philosophy and logic

Probable inference from cases

The form of reasoning that moves from particular observations to a general conclusion, where the evidence makes the conclusion probable but never guarantees it: many observed white swans support the claim that all swans are white without proving it. David Hume's 1748 An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding pressed the problem of induction, asking what justifies the leap from past cases to unobserved ones, and argued that no reasoning makes the conclusion certain. The referent is a pattern of uncertain, evidence-driven inference in logic and epistemology, and it is the exact opposite of the mathematical method that shares the word, which delivers certainty rather than probability; it has nothing to do with a magnetic field or a signaling embryonic cell.[1]

Unit
A single inductive inference from observed cases to a general claim
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Appraised by inductive logic and probability: how strongly the evidence raises the likelihood of the conclusion

Mathematics

Proof for all natural numbers

A rigorous method of proof that establishes a statement for every natural number in two steps: showing it holds for a starting case, then showing that whenever it holds for one number it must hold for the next. Bussey's 1917 The Origin of Mathematical Induction traced the history of the method and set out its precise logical form. Despite sharing the word with the philosopher's induction, this is not probable reasoning at all: the referent is a deductive technique that yields complete certainty across infinitely many cases, whereas inductive reasoning leaves its conclusions merely likely, and it is unrelated to a changing magnetic field or a developing embryo.[2]

Unit
A single proof by starting case and inductive step, covering all natural numbers
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Checked by verifying the base case and the inductive step are each valid, which together entail the general result

Physics and engineering

Voltage from a changing field

The production of a voltage, called an electromotive force, across a conductor when the magnetic field passing through it changes: move a magnet near a coil of wire and a current flows in the coil. Faraday's 1832 Experimental Researches in Electricity reported the effect and the law relating the induced force to how fast the field changes, the principle behind electric generators and transformers. The referent is a physical effect in wires and magnets, measured in volts, and it has nothing to do with a form of argument, a proof technique, or one cell steering another; here the word names a cause and effect in the laboratory, not a step in reasoning.[3]

Unit
An induced electromotive force across a conductor, in volts
Recovery means
The induced force falls to zero once the magnetic field stops changing
Measured by
Measured as the voltage or current induced in a circuit, and predicted from the rate of change of magnetic flux through it

Developmental biology

Cells directing neighbors' fate

The process by which one group of embryonic cells directs the developmental fate of neighboring cells through chemical signals, so that a tissue forms only where it receives the right cue. Spemann and Mangold's 1924 Über Induktion von Embryonalanlagen durch Implantation artfremder Organisatoren showed that a small region, the organizer, when grafted into a second embryo could induce a whole extra body axis, founding the study of induction in development. The referent is a signaling relationship between living cells, and despite the shared word it is not an inference, a proof, or a voltage: it names how an embryo builds its body, not how anyone reasons and not how a magnet drives a current.[4]

Unit
One inductive interaction: a signaling tissue and the responding cells whose fate it changes
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Demonstrated by grafting or removing the signaling tissue and observing whether the neighboring cells change their fate

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how induction sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

reasoning6 fields · 17 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsabduction2 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsdeduction3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Hume, D. (1748). An enquiry concerning human understanding. London: A. Millar.
  2. Bussey, W. H. (1917). The origin of mathematical induction. The American Mathematical Monthly, 24(5), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/2974308
  3. Faraday, M. (1832). Experimental researches in electricity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 122, 125–162. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1832.0006
  4. Spemann, H., & Mangold, H. (1924). Über Induktion von Embryonalanlagen durch Implantation artfremder Organisatoren. Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie und Entwicklungsmechanik, 100(3–4), 599–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108133

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct