Construct · 2 fields · 2 citations

Where does margin collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, two constructs Nearest construct by meaningmarginalcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to margin is marginal.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

margin2 CONSTRUCTSSurgical marginMORAN · TISSUE RIMMargin of errorLARSON · ERROR BAND

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Surgery and oncology

Rim of tissue around a tumour

In surgical oncology the margin is the rim of apparently normal tissue that a surgeon removes around a tumour, whose edge the pathologist then examines: a margin is called negative or clear when no cancer cells reach the inked surface of the excised specimen, and positive when they do, which usually calls for more surgery. Moran and colleagues' 2014 consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery defined an adequate margin for invasive breast cancer as no ink on tumour and weighed how wider margins do and do not change recurrence. The referent is a physical border of excised tissue, judged in millimetres under a microscope, and it is unrelated to a marginal unit, borrowed money, a poll's error band, or the edge of a field.[1]

Unit
The distance from tumour to the inked edge of the excised tissue, in millimetres
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by a pathologist, who inks the specimen surface and reports the margin as negative or positive

Statistics and survey methods

A poll estimate's error band

In survey statistics the margin of error is the half-width of a confidence interval around an estimate made from a sample: it says how far the reported figure might sit from the true population value by sampling chance alone, so a poll at 48 percent with a margin of error of 3 points spans roughly 45 to 51 percent. Larson's 2003 Misunderstanding margin of error examined how television news coverage of election polls reported and, often, misread this band. The referent is a quantified bound on sampling uncertainty, expressed in percentage points at a stated confidence level, and it does not name a marginal unit, a broker's loan, a rim of tissue, or an uncultivated strip beside a field.[2]

Unit
A bound on sampling error, in percentage points at a stated confidence level
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Calculated from the sample size, the estimate, and a confidence level, as the half-width of the interval

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how margin sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

value6 fields · 12 citationsjingle · one name, six constructscapital2 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsrisk6 fields · 13 citationsjingle · one name, six constructsmarginal3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Moran, M. S., Schnitt, S. J., Giuliano, A. E., Harris, J. R., Khan, S. A., Horton, J., ... Morrow, M. (2014). Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 21(3), 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3481-4
  2. Larson, S. G. (2003). Misunderstanding margin of error: Network news coverage of polls during the 2000 general election. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02238785

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct