Construct · 4 fields · 7 citations

Where does susceptibility collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningconsumer susceptibility to influencecompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to susceptibility is consumer susceptibility to influence.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

susceptibility4 CONSTRUCTSMagnetic responseFARADAY · FIELD RESPONSESusceptible hostKERMACK · SUSCEPTIBLESHypnotizabilityHULL · HYPNOTIZABILITYConsumer influenceBEARDEN · INFLUENCE

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Physics

A material's magnetic response to an applied field

In physics, susceptibility is the coefficient that says how strongly a material becomes magnetised when a magnetic field is applied to it: a large positive value means the material takes on a strong magnetisation in the field's direction, while a small negative value means it is faintly pushed the other way. Faraday's 1846 Experimental researches in electricity (twentieth series) established that every substance responds to a magnetic field, either drawn into it or repelled from it, which is the response this coefficient measures. Curie's 1895 study of magnetic properties across temperatures gave the law that a paramagnet's susceptibility falls in inverse proportion to its absolute temperature. The referent is a measurable ratio of a material's magnetisation to the field driving it, a number with no direct kin to a body's liability to disease or a person's readiness to be influenced or hypnotised.[1][2]

Unit
A dimensionless ratio of induced magnetisation to applied field strength (volume susceptibility)
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Determined from magnetisation-versus-field curves with a magnetometer, or from a sample's force in a field gradient

Epidemiology

A host's liability to acquire infection

In epidemiology, susceptibility is the condition of a host or population able to acquire an infection because it is not yet immune or otherwise protected. Kermack and McKendrick's 1927 A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics formalised this as the susceptible fraction of a population, the pool from which new cases are drawn as an outbreak spreads and which shrinks as people are infected or recover. The construct joins individual factors, such as immune status, genetics, age, and prior exposure, with the population share still at risk. The referent is a living host's or a community's liability to becoming infected, unrelated to a material's magnetic response or to a person's readiness to be swayed by others or by hypnotic suggestion.[3]

Unit
One host classed as able to acquire infection, or the fraction of a population still at risk
Recovery means
A susceptible host leaves the state by gaining immunity through infection or vaccination
Measured by
Estimated from serological surveys, attack rates, and the susceptible compartment of transmission models

Psychology (hypnosis)

Trait responsiveness to hypnotic suggestion

In psychology, hypnotic susceptibility is the stable individual trait of how readily a person responds to hypnotic suggestions. Hull's 1933 Hypnosis and suggestibility: An experimental approach first put this responsiveness on an experimental, quantitative footing, showing that people differ reliably in how far they follow suggested changes in movement, perception, and memory. Weitzenhoffer and Hilgard's 1959 Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale then fixed the standard graded test, scoring how many of a set of suggestions a person passes, and Hilgard's 1965 review consolidated the trait's stability and structure. The referent is a person's measured responsiveness to suggestion under hypnosis, distinct from a material's magnetic response, a host's liability to infection, and the ordinary tendency to go along with other people.[4][5][6]

Unit
A person's score on a graded hypnotic suggestion scale, from low to high responsiveness
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by standardised behavioural scales such as the Stanford or Harvard group scales, counting suggestions passed

Consumer and social psychology

Trait tendency to yield to others' influence

In consumer and social psychology, susceptibility to interpersonal influence is the trait tendency to let other people shape one's purchases and choices, both by conforming to their expectations and by looking to them for guidance. Bearden, Netemeyer, and Teel's 1989 Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence defined and scaled the construct, separating a normative strand, going along to gain approval or fit in, from an informational strand, treating others as a source of evidence about products. The measure is a self-report trait that predicts a person's sensitivity to peer and reference-group pressure in buying decisions. The referent is a person's readiness to be swayed by other people, not a material's magnetic response, a host's liability to infection, or responsiveness to hypnotic suggestion.[7]

Unit
A person's self-reported trait score on a susceptibility-to-influence scale
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by the Bearden, Netemeyer and Teel self-report scale with normative and informational subscales

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how susceptibility sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

consumer susceptibility to influence4 names · 4 citationsjangle · one openness, many namesimmunity3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsconformity3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Faraday, M. (1846). Experimental researches in electricity. Twentieth series. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 136, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1846.0003
  2. Curie, P. (1895). Propriétés magnétiques des corps à diverses températures. Annales de chimie et de physique, 5, 289–405.
  3. Kermack, W. O., & McKendrick, A. G. (1927). A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 115(772), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
  4. Hull, C. L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility: An experimental approach. Appleton-Century.
  5. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  6. Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnosis. Annual Review of Psychology, 16, 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.16.020165.001105
  7. Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1086/209186

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct