Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningaccommodationcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to assimilation is accommodation.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In Piaget's account of cognitive development, assimilation is the process of taking in new information and fitting it into a mental structure, or schema, that the person already has. A child who calls every four-legged animal a dog is assimilating a new animal into an existing schema. Piaget paired assimilation with its opposite, accommodation, in which the schema itself is altered to fit information that will not fit as it stands, and learning moves forward as the two work together. He set out this pairing in The Origins of Intelligence in Children. The referent here is a mental operation on an internal schema, not a minority group joining a wider society, a sound shifting toward its neighbor, or food being built into the body.[1]
In the sociology of migration, assimilation is the process by which an immigrant or minority group gradually takes on the language, customs, and identity of the dominant society and becomes less distinct from it over time. The classical view, drawn from Robert Park's idea of a race-relations cycle and Milton Gordon's account of its separate dimensions, treated this as a broadly one-directional path toward the mainstream. Later work questioned that single path: Portes and Zhou's The New Second Generation proposed segmented assimilation, in which different groups move toward different segments of society, some faring well and others less so. The word here names a social and cultural process for a group, studied across generations. It has nothing to do with a schema in a child's mind, a sound changing shape, or a nutrient entering a cell.[3][2]
In phonology, assimilation is a process in which a speech sound becomes more like a neighboring sound, so that the two are easier to produce in sequence. A common example is the way the n in input often shifts toward an m before the p, giving something like imput, because the lips are already closing for the p. Jun's chapter Place assimilation analyzes cases like this, where a consonant takes on the place of articulation of the sound next to it. The change can be partial or total, and it can reach forward or backward to the triggering sound. The referent is a pattern in the sound system of a language, not a mental schema, a group joining a society, or matter absorbed by an organism.[4]
Next
See how assimilation sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct