Construct · 4 names · 6 citations

Where does born global collide?

Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.

● jangle · one early-internationalizing firm, many names Nearest construct by meaningentrepreneurial orientationcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to born global is entrepreneurial orientation.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

born global4 NAMESBorn-global firmRENNIE · BORN GLOBALNew venture (INV)OVIATT-MCDOUGALL · INVGlobal start-upOVIATT-MCDOUGALL · GLOBALIntl entrep.MCDOUGALL-OVIATT · IE

Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

International marketing

a firm that begins exporting and selling abroad at or very near its founding, rather than growing at home first.

A firm that begins exporting and selling abroad at or very near its founding, rather than building a home base first and expanding overseas only after years of domestic growth. The label comes from Rennie's 1993 McKinsey Quarterly report Born global, which found Australian manufacturers that were competing internationally within two years of starting; Knight and Cavusgil's 2004 study in the Journal of International Business Studies then gave it a theory, tying early global reach to a young firm's innovative culture and marketing capabilities. Of the names on this page this is the practitioner-born, marketing-facing one, usually pinned to a share-of-foreign-sales threshold reached soon after birth, in contrast to the venture-theory framing that defines the same firm by where its resources sit.[1][2]

Unit
One firm, dated from founding to first substantial foreign sales
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Operationalised by a foreign-sales share (often 25 percent or more) reached within a few years of founding

International entrepreneurship theory

a business that, from inception, seeks competitive advantage by using resources and selling outputs in more than one country.

A business that, from inception, seeks competitive advantage by using resources and selling outputs in more than one country. Oviatt and McDougall's 1994 Toward a theory of international new ventures in the Journal of International Business Studies is the label that gave the phenomenon its theory, explaining early internationalization through the control of assets, the location of activities across borders, and the internalisation of some transactions rather than others. This is the same firm the marketing literature calls born global, but the definition turns on the geography of resources and value chain from day one, not on a sales threshold, so a venture can qualify here on where it produces and sources even before its foreign revenue is large.[3]

Unit
One venture defined by cross-border resources and outputs from inception
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Operationalised by the count of countries in which the venture holds assets or earns sales at or near founding

Entrepreneurship

a new firm that coordinates sourcing, production, financing, and selling across many countries at once, not mainly at home.

The most extreme type of the same phenomenon: a new firm that coordinates many activities, sourcing, production, financing, and selling, across many countries at once, rather than concentrating them at home. Oviatt and McDougall's 1995 Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage in Academy of Management Perspectives set this vivid, practitioner-facing name against the narrower cases in their own typology, where a young firm might internationalize only its selling or only a few functions. Popular writing has also called such firms instant internationals. On this page the label marks the far end of the range: the born-global and new-venture names cover any firm that goes abroad early, while global start-up is reserved for one that is globally dispersed on many fronts at birth.[4]

Unit
One new firm coordinating many value-chain activities across many countries
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Operationalised by the spread of activities and geographies coordinated from founding

Management research

the research field joining innovative, proactive, risk-seeking behaviour with cross-border activity, folding born globals into one agenda.

The umbrella research field that grew up around all of these firms, where early internationalization is studied as one strand of a broader domain. McDougall and Oviatt's 2000 International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths in the Academy of Management Journal defined that domain as the combination of innovative, proactive, risk-seeking behaviour and cross-border activity, folding born globals and international new ventures into a single agenda; Autio, Sapienza, and Almeida's 2000 study of age at entry gave it the learning-advantages-of-newness argument for why young firms internationalize faster. Unlike the other names, which each pick out a kind of firm, this label names the scholarly field and its theory, so it can be true of a study without pointing at any one company.[5][6]

Unit
One research domain covering innovative, risk-taking, cross-border activity
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Marked in the literature by shared theory, journals, and constructs rather than by counting firms

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how born global sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

entrepreneurial orientation6 names · 10 citationsjangle · two scales, one name, contestednetwork4 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsargument3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Rennie, M. W. (1993). Born global. The McKinsey Quarterly, (4), 45–52.
  2. Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071
  3. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193
  4. Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1995). Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(2), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1995.9506273269
  5. McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 902–906. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556418
  6. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556419

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct