Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does cannibalization collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningpredationcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to cannibalization is predation.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

cannibalization4 CONSTRUCTSCannibalization rateVAN HEERDE · OWN SALESCannibalismFOX · INTRASPECIFICStream captureBISHOP · STREAM CAPTUREPart cannibalizationSALMAN · PART ROBBING

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Marketing

lost sales of a firm's existing product caused by the same firm introducing a new offering, like a line extension.

The loss of sales of a firm's existing product that is caused by that same firm introducing a new offering, such as a line extension or a variant, so part of the new product's revenue is merely captured from the seller's own baseline rather than won from rivals or created as fresh demand. Van Heerde, Srinivasan, and Dekimpe's 2010 Estimating cannibalization rates for pioneering innovations decomposed a new product's sales into cannibalization, competitive draw, and primary demand, showing that net demand can be far below total demand. The referent is a shift of revenue between products of the same owner, quantified as a cannibalization rate, not an animal eating its own kind, a river taking another's flow, or a machine stripped for parts.[1][2]

Unit
A share of a new product's sales taken from the firm's own existing products, the cannibalization rate
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated from sales or transaction data by modelling how much of a new product's demand is drawn from the firm's existing line rather than from competitors or new buyers

Behavioral ecology and zoology

Eating one's own kind

The act of one individual killing and consuming another member of its own species, spanning sexual cannibalism, filial cannibalism, and size-structured predation among juveniles, with consequences for survival, life history, and population dynamics. Fox's 1975 Cannibalism in natural populations surveyed how common the behavior is across taxa and when it is favoured, and Polis's 1981 review set it out as a form of intraspecific predation that can regulate populations. The referent is a literal feeding event between conspecifics, counted as a rate of consumption in a population, not a firm's lost sales, a captured river, or a scavenged spare part.[3][4]

Unit
A conspecific consumed, as a rate of cannibalism in a population
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Recorded in the field or laboratory as the frequency of conspecific consumption, and modelled through its effects on survival, growth, and population size

Geomorphology and hydrology

One river captures another

The redirection of one drainage into another when a stream erodes headward and breaches the divide that separates it from a neighbour, capturing that neighbour's upper catchment and diverting its flow, a process also called stream piracy or river capture. Bishop's 1995 Drainage rearrangement by river capture, beheading and diversion reviewed how such rearrangement reshapes drainage networks and sediment budgets, while cautioning that the headward retreat it assumes is not as self-evident as the abundant literature suggests. The referent is a landscape-evolution process in which one river gains territory at another's expense, mapped from channels and divides, not a sales loss, an act of eating, or a maintenance workaround.[5]

Unit
A captured reach of drainage, by area of catchment diverted
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Inferred from the geometry of channels, wind gaps, barbed tributaries, and drainage divides, and from sediment provenance

Maintenance engineering

Robbing parts to fix another

The practice of removing a serviceable part from one unit, vehicle, or aircraft in order to restore another to working condition, trading the availability of the donor for that of the recipient when a spare is not on hand. Salman, Cassady, Pohl, and Ormon's 2007 Evaluating the impact of cannibalization on fleet performance modelled how this transfer of parts raises the readiness of some assets at the cost of grounding others, and how it strains the maintenance workforce. The referent is a supply and readiness tactic within a fleet, measured by its effect on availability and labour, not a firm's own sales, an animal's meal, or a river taking another's water.[6]

Unit
A part moved from a donor unit to keep another in service
Recovery means
The donor is restored when the missing part is finally replaced from supply
Measured by
Tracked as cannibalization actions across a fleet and modelled by their effect on operational availability and maintenance workload

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how cannibalization sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

availability2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructsbaseline2 fields · 2 citationsjingle · one word, two constructscapture4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. van Heerde, H. J., Srinivasan, S., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2010). Estimating cannibalization rates for pioneering innovations. Marketing Science, 29(6), 1024–1039. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1100.0575
  2. Mason, C. H., & Milne, G. R. (1994). An approach for identifying cannibalization within product line extensions and multi-brand strategies. Journal of Business Research, 31(2–3), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90080-9
  3. Fox, L. R. (1975). Cannibalism in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 6, 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.000511
  4. Polis, G. A. (1981). The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 12, 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001301
  5. Bishop, P. (1995). Drainage rearrangement by river capture, beheading and diversion. Progress in Physical Geography, 19(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339501900402
  6. Salman, S., Cassady, C. R., Pohl, E. A., & Ormon, S. W. (2007). Evaluating the impact of cannibalization on fleet performance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23(4), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.826

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct