Construct · 3 names · 6 citations
Different names. Different fields. One construct. One map.
● jangle · two optimisms, measured apart Nearest construct by meaningpsychological capitalcompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to dispositional optimism is psychological capital.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are the names and the models that coined them; dashed arcs are borrowings. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each name appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
Optimism defined as a generalized expectancy that good rather than bad things will happen across life's domains, treated as a stable, trait-like disposition. Scheier and Carver introduced this reading in their 1985 paper Optimism, coping, and health, grounding it in their model of behavioural self-regulation, in which people who expect favourable outcomes keep pursuing their goals. They measured it with the Life Orientation Test, a short set of items about expected good and bad outcomes, and revised it in 1994 as the LOT-R after work showing the original overlapped with neuroticism and related traits. In this tradition optimism is about what a person expects, not about how they explain the past, and it is scored as a single number on a self-report scale. It is the referent the rest of this map is measured against.[1][2]
A different tradition treats optimism not as an expectancy but as an attributional or explanatory style, the habitual way a person explains the causes of bad events. Peterson and Seligman's 1984 paper Causal explanations as a risk factor for depression framed a pessimistic style as attributing bad events to internal, stable, and global causes, and an optimistic style as the reverse. It is measured either with the Attributional Style Questionnaire, in which people rate the causes they give for hypothetical events on those three dimensions, or with the CAVE method, which codes the same dimensions from natural language such as interviews or diaries. This optimism is about explanation rather than expectation, and it lives in a separate literature on depression and learned helplessness. It shares the English word optimism with the Scheier and Carver construct but not the measurement.[3][4]
Across positive psychology, optimism is studied as a personal resource tied to better coping, higher well-being, and more favourable physical-health outcomes. Carver, Scheier, and Segerstrom's 2010 review Optimism gathers this evidence and keeps the expectancy definition, while noting that findings depend on which measure a study uses. Optimism also appears as one of the four components of psychological capital, alongside hope, resilience, and self-efficacy, in Luthans and colleagues' 2007 work on measuring that higher-order construct at work. Studies in this vein usually enter an optimism score as a predictor of an outcome, so the construct's meaning is inherited from whichever scale supplied that score. For related pages see well-being and psychological-capital, where optimism recurs as an input.[5][6]
Next
See how dispositional optimism sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct