Construct · 3 fields · 4 citations

Where does harmony collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningchordcompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to harmony is chord.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

harmony3 CONSTRUCTSMusical harmonyRAMEAU · CHORDSVowel harmonyNEVINS · VOWEL AGREEMENTPre-est. harmonyLEIBNIZ · SYNCED MONADS

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Music theory

Combining pitches into chords

The combining of simultaneous pitches into chords, and the study of how those chords are built, connected, and voiced across a piece: harmony is the vertical dimension of music, set against melody, which is one line in time, and rhythm, which is its pattern of durations. Rameau's 1722 Treatise on Harmony grounded this study in the chord and its fundamental root, and showed how progressions of chords give tonal music its direction. The referent here is an audible relation among pitches sounded together, described by chords and voice-leading, not a rule about vowels in a word, a doctrine about non-interacting substances, or an ideal for how a society should hold together.[1]

Unit
A chord and its place in a progression, scaled by the intervals between its pitches
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Analysed by labelling chords, identifying their roots and functions, and tracing how the separate voices move between them

Linguistics and phonology

a sound-system rule forcing the vowels within a word to agree in some feature, so suffix vowels match the stem.

A rule in the sound system of a language that forces the vowels within a word to agree in some feature, such as whether the tongue is front or back or whether the lips are rounded, so that a suffix vowel changes to match the stem it attaches to: languages like Turkish, Finnish, and Hungarian are governed by it. Nevins's 2010 Locality in Vowel Harmony set out how this agreement spreads across a word and what limits its reach. The referent is a constraint on which speech sounds may co-occur in a spoken word, tested against the shape of real words, and it has nothing to do with pitches sounded together, a claim about the universe, or concord among people.[2]

Unit
A phonological rule requiring the vowels of a word to share one feature
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified by recording which vowels can occur together in words and how a suffix vowel alternates with the stem it follows

Philosophy and metaphysics

Leibniz's doctrine that monads never act on one another yet unfold in exact correspondence because God set them in agreement.

Leibniz's doctrine that the simple substances making up the world, his monads, never causally act on one another, yet each unfolds in exact correspondence with all the others because God set them in agreement at creation: a mind and its body appear to interact only because their independent series were tuned in advance, like two clocks kept in step without a connecting thread. Leibniz stated it in his 1714 Monadology, and Kulstad's 1993 analysis weighed the competing readings of what it claims. The referent is a metaphysical account of order without interaction, defended by argument, and it is far from a way of combining pitches, a rule about vowels, or a goal for social life.[3][4]

Unit
A metaphysical doctrine that independent substances correspond without ever interacting
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Argued rather than measured, by weighing it against causal interaction and occasionalist accounts of how mind and body relate

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how harmony sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

cohesion4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructscounterpoint3 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs (borrowed by analogy)symmetry4 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, four constructs

References

  1. Rameau, J.-P. (1971). Treatise on harmony (P. Gossett, Trans.). Dover. (Original work published 1722) ISBN 9780486224619
  2. Nevins, A. (2010). Locality in vowel harmony. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262140973.001.0001
  3. Leibniz, G. W. (1989). The monadology. In R. Ariew & D. Garber (Eds. & Trans.), Philosophical essays (pp. 213–225). Hackett. (Original work published 1714) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1426-7_68
  4. Kulstad, M. A. (1993). Two interpretations of the pre-established harmony in the philosophy of Leibniz. Synthese, 96(3), 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064013

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct