Construct · 5 fields · 5 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, five constructs Nearest construct by meaningevent horizoncompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to horizon is event horizon.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
A layer of soil lying roughly parallel to the ground surface, distinguished from the layers above and below it by its colour, texture, structure, or composition: a vertical section through the soil, exposed in a pit, shows a sequence of these horizons, labelled with master letters such as O for surface organic matter, A for the dark topsoil, B for the subsoil where materials accumulate, and C for the weathering parent material. Hartemink and colleagues' 2020 review Soil horizon variation surveyed how these horizons are recognised, designated, and how much they vary within a soil. The referent is a physical stratum of ground, described by depth and boundary, not an edge in spacetime, a background of understanding, or a stretch of future time.[1]
The boundary surrounding a black hole beyond which nothing, not even light, can escape to the outside: it is not a solid surface but a one-way threshold in spacetime, its radius set by the hole's mass, and an outside observer can never see any event that happens within it. The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration's 2019 paper First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results reported the first image of the bright ring and dark shadow cast by the region just outside such a horizon at the centre of galaxy M87. The referent is a boundary in gravity's geometry, inferred from what light does near it, and it has nothing in common with a layer of soil, a background of meaning, or a span of planning time.[2]
The encompassing background of prior understanding, assumption, and possibility against which anything at all shows up as meaningful: whatever is grasped is grasped from somewhere, within a range of what can be seen and expected, and that range is one's horizon. Gadamer's 1960 Truth and Method developed the idea that understanding another text or person is a fusion of horizons, in which one's own background of meaning is widened by meeting theirs. The referent is a structure of interpretation, drawn out in reflection and dialogue, and it is not a layer in the ground, a boundary in spacetime, or a measured length of future time.[3]
The length of the future period taken into account in a plan, decision, or investment: a saver choosing how to hold wealth, or a firm weighing a project, fixes some span of time over which outcomes are considered, and choices that look best over a short horizon can look poor over a long one. Samuelson's 1969 Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming worked out how an investor should allocate wealth over a finite or lifelong horizon, showing how the length of that horizon shapes the decision. The referent is a chosen stretch of future time, counted in periods or years, and it is unrelated to a soil layer, a black hole's edge, or a background of understanding.[4]
In archaeology, horizon refers to a set of cultural traits spread widely over space in a short time, used to link sites across a region. This meaning comes from Willey (1958) in Method and theory in American archaeology.[5]
Next
See how horizon sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct