Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations

Where does possibility collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningmodalitycompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to possibility is modality.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

possibility3 CONSTRUCTSModal possibilityKRIPKE · POSSIBLE WORLDSPossibility theoryZADEH · FUZZY POSSIBILITYPossibility thinkingCRAFT · WHAT-IF THINKING

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Fuzzy logic and artificial intelligence

a number between zero and one grading how unsurprising a value would be given imprecise information, distinct from probability.

In fuzzy logic and artificial intelligence, a possibility is a number between zero and one that grades how unsurprising a value would be given imprecise information, forming a calculus that is deliberately different from probability. Zadeh's 1978 Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility derived a possibility distribution from a fuzzy set, so that a soft description such as 'John is young' fixes, for each age, how possible that age is, paired with a matching necessity measure. Here possibility is a degree assigned to alternatives to model vague or incomplete knowledge, and it is not a proposition's standing across possible worlds or a person's disposition to explore what might be.[2]

Unit
A degree in [0, 1] attached to each candidate value in a distribution
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Computed as the possibility distribution induced by a fuzzy restriction, with its dual necessity measure

Psychology and creativity in education

the capacity to move from what is to what if, posing questions and imagining alternatives as a source of creativity.

In creativity and education research, possibility thinking is the human capacity to move from 'what is' to 'what if', posing questions, imagining alternatives, and playing with options as an engine of everyday creativity. Cremin, Burnard, and Craft's 2006 Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years studied how teachers foster it in young children through question posing, play, immersion, and self-determination, treating it as a measurable feature of classroom practice. Here possibility is an observable way of thinking and acting that generates new options, and it is not a modal status of a proposition or a graded number attached to uncertain data.[3]

Unit
An instance of imaginative what-if thinking, coded in behaviour and talk
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Identified through observation and analysis of question posing, play, and children's exploratory talk

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how possibility sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

necessity3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsactuality4 fields · 4 citationsjingle · one word, four constructsmodality3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Kripke, S. A. (1963). Semantical considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16, 83–94.
  2. Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5
  3. Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.07.001

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct