Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations
One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.
● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaningcoevolutioncompare the meaningsEvery construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to mutualism is coevolution.
Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.
Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.
Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.
In ecology and evolutionary biology, mutualism is an interaction between two species that benefits both of them, a plus/plus relationship in which each partner gains in survival or reproduction from the other's presence. Familiar cases include flowering plants and their pollinators, plant roots and the fungi that feed them (mycorrhizae), and reef fish that pick parasites off larger fish. Boucher, James, and Keeler's 1982 review The Ecology of Mutualism gathered these interactions into one field and set them apart from one-sided benefit (commensalism) and from exploitation (parasitism). The referent is a relationship between organisms of different species, measured by fitness, and it has nothing to do with an economic doctrine or a member-run insurance body.[1]
In political economy, mutualism is the economic and political theory developed by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon in which production and exchange are organised through voluntary reciprocity rather than through the state or through capitalist ownership. Its central proposals include free association of producers, workers' cooperatives, mutual credit banks that lend at cost, and the exchange of goods valued by the labour that made them. Proudhon set out this program in his 1851 General Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century, where free contract and reciprocity are meant to replace governing authority. This referent is a theory about how people might organise economic life, and it is unrelated to a biological interaction between species or to a particular kind of insurance body, even though all three share the word.[2]
In sociology and social history, mutualism (or mutual aid) names the cooperative, member-run organisations through which ordinary people pool risk and help one another: friendly societies, fraternal orders, cooperatives, and mutual insurers whose members pay dues and draw benefits in sickness, old age, or death. Van Leeuwen's 2016 Mutual Insurance 1550-2015 traced these bodies from guild welfare and friendly societies to present-day micro-insurers, showing how members shared risk before and alongside the modern welfare state. The referent is a form of collective social organisation, counted by membership and benefits paid, and it is distinct from a two-species interaction in nature and from Proudhon's economic doctrine, though the sociological meaning and the economic one both grew from the nineteenth-century culture of association.[3]
Next
See how mutualism sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.
Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collisionCited on this page?
If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.
Claim your construct