Construct · 3 fields · 3 citations

Where does poisoning collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, three constructs Nearest construct by meaning·not indexed
poisoning3 CONSTRUCTSCatalyst poisoningBARTHOLOMEW · 2001Toxicological poisoningCASARETT & DOULLData poisoningJAGIELSKI ET AL. · 2018

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Catalysis

A catalyst's active sites get blocked

In heterogeneous catalysis, poisoning is one route by which a catalyst deactivates: a chemical species binds strongly, often irreversibly, to the active sites on the catalyst surface and blocks the reactant molecules that would otherwise be converted there. Even trace amounts of a poison such as sulphur, lead, or chlorine can suppress a large fraction of activity, because a single adsorbed poison atom can deny access to several neighbouring sites. Bartholomew's 2001 review Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation sets poisoning alongside fouling, sintering, and volatilisation as distinct deactivation pathways. The referent here is the loss of a solid catalyst's working capacity, not harm to an organism or corruption of a learned model.[1]

Unit
Fraction of active sites blocked, read as the decline in catalytic activity over time
Recovery means
If the poison binds reversibly, activity returns on regeneration (oxidative or reductive treatment); strongly chemisorbed poisons deactivate the catalyst permanently
Measured by
Tracked by the fall in conversion or turnover frequency with time on stream, and by surface analysis of the adsorbed poison

Toxicology

A dose harms a living body

In toxicology, poisoning is the injury a chemical causes to a living organism once the dose, route, and duration of exposure overwhelm the body's capacity to tolerate or clear it. The discipline rests on the dose-response relationship: the same substance may be harmless or therapeutic at a low dose and lethal at a high one, so that toxicity is a property of the exposure, not merely of the agent. Klaassen's Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons is the standard reference for how poisons are absorbed, distributed, act, and are measured. The referent is damage to a biological system from chemical exposure, unrelated to a blocked catalyst or a corrupted training set.[2]

Unit
Severity of harm as a function of dose, route, and exposure duration
Recovery means
Many poisonings resolve with elimination, supportive care, or a specific antidote; others leave lasting injury or are fatal
Measured by
Characterised by dose-response endpoints such as the LD50, threshold and no-observed-adverse-effect levels, and biomarkers of exposure and effect

Machine learning

Tainted training data corrupts a model

In machine learning security, poisoning is an attack carried out during training rather than at prediction time: an adversary who can inject or alter a fraction of the training examples steers the model that is learned from them, degrading its overall accuracy or planting a targeted error the attacker can later exploit. Because models are increasingly trained on data gathered from open or untrusted sources, even a small share of crafted points can shift the fitted parameters. Jagielski and colleagues' 2018 Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learning formalises such attacks and defences for regression. The referent is the corruption of a learned model through its training data, a different thing entirely from a poisoned catalyst or a poisoned body.[3]

Unit
Model degradation or attack success as a function of the fraction of training data poisoned
Recovery means
Mitigated by data sanitisation, robust or certified training, and outlier removal rather than reversed after the fact
Measured by
Assessed by the rise in test error, or the targeted attack's success rate, against the proportion of poisoned training points

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how poisoning sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

accuracy3 fields · 6 citationsjingle · one word, three constructsagent3 fields · 5 citationsjingle · one word, three constructs

References

  1. Bartholomew, C. H. (2001). Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Applied Catalysis A: General, 212(1–2), 17–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00843-7
  2. Klaassen, C. D. (Ed.). (2013). Casarett and Doull's toxicology: The basic science of poisons (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 9780071769235
  3. Jagielski, M., Oprea, A., Biggio, B., Liu, C., Nita-Rotaru, C., & Li, B. (2018). Manipulating machine learning: Poisoning attacks and countermeasures for regression learning. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 19–35). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2018.00057

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct