Construct · 4 fields · 6 citations

Where does rebound collide?

One name. Different field. Different construct. One map.

● jingle · one word, four constructs Nearest construct by meaningrestitutioncompare the meanings
How to read this

Every construct on the map is compared with every other by the meaning of its definitions, and the closest one is surfaced here. The nearest construct to rebound is restitution.

Hold this as a prompt, not a verdict. Two constructs sitting close in meaning is a reason to read them side by side and decide for yourself whether they are one idea under two names. It is not proof that they are. Compare the meanings in the Collider.

rebound4 CONSTRUCTSRebound (impact)NEWTON · IMPACT REBOUNDRebound effectJEVONS · REBOUND EFFECTRebound (withdrawal)KALES · WITHDRAWALThought reboundWEGNER · SUPPRESSION

Spokes are fields; dashed arcs are shared lineage. Tap a field for its definition, unit, and measures.

2026

Drag to watch the word get claimed. Each field appears at the publication date of the earliest source cited for it. Tap a year to see which.

Physics

Elastic bounce back after a collision

In physics, rebound is the bounce back of a body after it strikes another, and how much speed it keeps is captured by the coefficient of restitution, the ratio of the separation speed to the approach speed. Newton reported the origin of this idea in his 1687 Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica, where colliding pendulums were observed to fly apart with a relative speed in fixed proportion to the relative speed at which they met. Cross's 1999 The bounce of a ball measured this ratio for real balls on hard surfaces and showed how it changes with speed and material. The referent is a mechanical bounce governed by a measured ratio, not an economy's extra fuel use, a symptom returning after a drug, or a thought that comes back after being pushed away.[1][2]

Unit
A single collision, scaled by the coefficient of restitution from 0 (no bounce) to 1 (perfectly elastic)
Recovery means
Stored elastic deformation returns part of the impact energy as the body springs back
Measured by
Found by comparing separation speed to approach speed, often from high-speed video or drop-and-bounce height tests

Energy economics

Efficiency gains partly taken back as more use

In economics, the rebound effect is the tendency for gains in energy efficiency to be partly offset because a cheaper energy service leads people to use more of it. William Stanley Jevons first described this in his 1865 book The coal question, arguing that more efficient steam engines raised, rather than lowered, total coal consumption. Khazzoom's 1980 Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances gave the modern formulation, framing the effect through the price elasticity of demand for the energy service. The referent is a market and behavioural response measured as a share of expected savings, not a physical bounce, a symptom after a drug, or a suppressed thought.[3][4]

Unit
One efficiency improvement, scaled as the share of expected energy savings taken back through greater use
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Estimated from the price elasticity of demand for the energy service, or by comparing projected savings against observed consumption

Medicine and pharmacology

Symptoms overshoot when a drug is withdrawn

In medicine, the rebound effect is the return, often in a stronger form, of the very symptoms a drug was holding down once the drug is stopped or its level falls. Kales, Scharf, and Kales named a clear case in their 1978 Rebound insomnia: A new clinical syndrome, showing that patients coming off certain sleeping pills slept worse than they had before treatment. They described this overshoot as a distinct withdrawal pattern rather than a simple relapse. The referent is a physiological overshoot tied to a withdrawn medicine, not a bouncing object, an economy's extra fuel use, or the resurgence of a suppressed thought.[5]

Unit
One course of treatment, scaled by how far the withdrawn symptom overshoots its pre-treatment level
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Assessed by comparing symptom severity after stopping the drug against the pre-treatment baseline, often in controlled withdrawal studies

Psychology

Suppressed thoughts return more strongly

In psychology, the rebound effect is the resurgence of an unwanted thought after a person has been trying to push it out of mind, so that suppression can leave the thought more available than if it had been left alone. Wegner, Schneider, Carter, and White demonstrated it in their 1987 Paradoxical effects of thought suppression, where people told not to think of a white bear thought of it more once the restriction was lifted. Their account traces the effect to a monitoring process that keeps searching for the forbidden thought and thereby keeps it active. The referent is a mental overshoot after deliberate suppression, not a physical bounce, an economy's extra consumption, or a symptom returning after a drug.[6]

Unit
One episode of attempted suppression, scaled by how much the target thought recurs afterward
Recovery means
Not applicable
Measured by
Counted as the frequency of the target thought after suppression, using think-aloud reports or streams of consciousness with a marker for each occurrence

Next

Run it through the Collider, or take the citations with you.

See how rebound sits against neighbouring constructs in the Collider, or export every reference on this page in one click.

Open in ColliderExport BibTeXReport this collision

Nearby collisions

restitution3 fields · 3 citationsjingle · one word, three constructselasticity3 fields · 7 citationsjingle · one word, three sciencesresilience6 fields · 9 citationsjingle · one name, six constructs

References

  1. Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica. Royal Society.
  2. Cross, R. (1999). The bounce of a ball. American Journal of Physics, 67(3), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19229
  3. Jevons, W. S. (1865). The coal question: An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. Macmillan.
  4. Khazzoom, J. D. (1980). Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. The Energy Journal, 1(4), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol1-No4-2
  5. Kales, A., Scharf, M. B., & Kales, J. D. (1978). Rebound insomnia: A new clinical syndrome. Science, 201(4360), 1039–1041. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.684426
  6. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5

Cited on this page?

Confirm your construct, or correct us.

If your work is cited behind one of these entries, you know better than we do whether we captured the meaning right. Confirm it, suggest an edit, or dispute it, and your name goes on the entry as an author who has checked it, linked to your ORCID.

Claim your construct